These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21474281)

  • 1. Systematic mixed-methods reviews are not ready to be assessed with the available tools.
    Bouchard K; Dubuisson W; Simard J; Dorval M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):926-8. PubMed ID: 21474281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
    Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Qualitative methods: systematic reviews in qualitative health-care research as a basis for evidence-based practice].
    Hasseler M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2007 May; 69(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17582547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cochrane EPOC group: closing the gap between quality assurance and organization of care research and front line professionals].
    Moja PL; Castelli B; McCauley L; Grilli R; Auxilia F
    Ann Ig; 2005; 17(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 16523717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [On diseases in the neck and upper musculoskeletal system: Too low scientific quality in the SBU report].
    Järvholm B; Andersen JH; Veiersted B
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Jun 19-26; 109(25):1235; discussion 1236. PubMed ID: 22838114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Harms M
    Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based guidelines--an introduction.
    Lim W; Arnold DM; Bachanova V; Haspel RL; Rosovsky RP; Shustov AR; Crowther MA
    Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program; 2008; ():26-30. PubMed ID: 19074050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based evaluation of information: the centrality and limitations of systematic reviews.
    Järvholm B; Bohlin I
    Scand J Public Health; 2014 Mar; 42(13 Suppl):3-10. PubMed ID: 24553849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
    Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews.
    Connelly LM
    Medsurg Nurs; 2009; 18(3):181-2. PubMed ID: 19591365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Rapid reviews for evidence-based decision support. (Restricting) requirements].
    Ziegler S; Lühmann D; Raspe H; Windeler J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 11268875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Included in Systematic Reviews)].
    Schuetz GM; Tackmann R; Hamm B; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2010 Nov; 182(11):939-42. PubMed ID: 20922647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based dental care--a concept review.
    Nainar SM
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(7):418-21. PubMed ID: 9866146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Developing quality indicators: background, methods and problems].
    Kötter T; Schaefer F; Blozik E; Scherer M
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 21382599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is there a voucher for the impact of quality assurance/-improvement methods in foreign countries?].
    Simoes E; Boukamp K; Mayer ED; Schmahl FW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2004 Jun; 66(6):370-9. PubMed ID: 15206040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of regional guidelines for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in women at low obstetric risk.
    Hinsliff SW; Hindley C; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 15571883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Making GRADE accessible: a proposal for graphic display of evidence quality assessments.
    Khan KS; Borowiack E; Roos C; Kowalska M; Zapalska A; Mol BW; Mignini L; Meads C; Walczak J;
    Evid Based Med; 2011 Jun; 16(3):65-9. PubMed ID: 21593102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.