129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21474409)
1. The validity of self-reported cancer diagnoses and factors associated with accurate reporting in a cohort of older Australian women.
Stavrou E; Vajdic CM; Loxton D; Pearson SA
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 35(6):e75-80. PubMed ID: 21474409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of registry data: agreement between cancer records in an end-stage kidney disease registry (voluntary reporting) and a cancer register (statutory reporting).
Webster AC; Supramaniam R; O'Connell DL; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Nephrology (Carlton); 2010 Jun; 15(4):491-501. PubMed ID: 20609104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of self-reported cancer among a Japanese population: recent results from a population-based prospective study in Japan (JPHC Study).
Inoue M; Sawada N; Shimazu T; Yamaji T; Iwasaki M; Sasazuki S; Tsugane S;
Cancer Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 35(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 21233037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of self reported diagnoses of cancer in a major Spanish prospective cohort study.
Navarro C; Chirlaque MD; Tormo MJ; Pérez-Flores D; Rodríguez-Barranco M; Sánchez-Villegas A; Agudo A; Pera G; Amiano P; Dorronsoro M; Larrañaga N; Quirós JR; Ardanaz E; Barricarte A; Martínez C; Sánchez MJ; Berenguer A; González CA
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Jul; 60(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16790831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The validity of self-reported cancer in an Australian population study.
Loh V; Harding J; Koshkina V; Barr E; Shaw J; Magliano D
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2014 Feb; 38(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 24494943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of self-reported family history of cancer in a large case-control study of ovarian cancer.
Soegaard M; Jensen A; Frederiksen K; Høgdall E; Høgdall C; Blaakaer J; Kjaer SK
Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Jun; 19(5):469-79. PubMed ID: 18197461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of self-reported family history of cancer in a large case-control study of lymphoma.
Chang ET; Smedby KE; Hjalgrim H; Glimelius B; Adami HO
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jan; 98(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 16391372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validity of self-reported Pap smear history in Norwegian women.
Klungsøyr O; Nygård M; Skare G; Eriksen T; Nygård JF
J Med Screen; 2009; 16(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 19564522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupation and cancer - follow-up of 15 million people in five Nordic countries.
Pukkala E; Martinsen JI; Lynge E; Gunnarsdottir HK; Sparén P; Tryggvadottir L; Weiderpass E; Kjaerheim K
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(5):646-790. PubMed ID: 19925375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cancer incidence in Israeli Jewish survivors of World War II.
Keinan-Boker L; Vin-Raviv N; Liphshitz I; Linn S; Barchana M
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Nov; 101(21):1489-500. PubMed ID: 19861305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The importance of the common cancer registry for the identification of cancer cases in the EPIC Potsdam-study -- results of the first record linkage].
Bergmann MM; Noethlings U; Eisinger B; Streller B; Quehl A; Walter D; Lahmann PH; Boeing H
Gesundheitswesen; 2004; 66(8-9):475-81. PubMed ID: 15372347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.
Hsia J; Kemper E; Kiefe C; Zapka J; Sofaer S; Pettinger M; Bowen D; Limacher M; Lillington L; Mason E
Prev Med; 2000 Sep; 31(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 10964640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moderate agreement between self-reported stroke and hospital-recorded stroke in two cohorts of Australian women: a validation study.
Jackson CA; Mishra GD; Tooth L; Byles J; Dobson A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jan; 15():7. PubMed ID: 25613556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mortality rates among early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a population-based cohort study in Denmark.
Christiansen P; Bjerre K; Ejlertsen B; Jensen MB; Rasmussen BB; Lænkholm AV; Kroman N; Ewertz M; Offersen B; Toftdahl DB; Møller S; Mouridsen HT;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Sep; 103(18):1363-72. PubMed ID: 21881042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of bias in familial risk estimates: a study of common cancers using Swedish population-based registers.
Leu M; Reilly M; Czene K
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1318-25. PubMed ID: 18780865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of self-reported birthweight among middle-aged and elderly women in the Danish Nurse Cohort Study.
Wodskou PM; Hundrup YA; Obel EB; Jørgensen T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Sep; 89(9):1134-9. PubMed ID: 20804338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of self-reported data on assisted conception in The Danish National Birth Cohort.
Hvidtjørn D; Grove J; Schendel D; Schieve LA; Ernst E; Olsen J; Thorsen P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2332-40. PubMed ID: 19454590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of stillbirth data using linked self-reported and administrative datasets.
Hure AJ; Chojenta CL; Powers JR; Byles JE; Loxton D
J Epidemiol; 2015; 25(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 25367675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening.
Khoja S; McGregor SE; Hilsden RJ
Can Fam Physician; 2007 Jul; 53(7):1192-7. PubMed ID: 17872816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
