These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21474775)

  • 1. Grading bulbar redness using cross-calibrated clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(8):5812-7. PubMed ID: 21474775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perceived bulbar redness of clinical grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):E1250-8. PubMed ID: 19770812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conversion of bulbar redness grades using psychophysical scaling.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Mar; 87(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 20125060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of fractal analysis and photometry to estimate the accuracy of bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Hutchings N; Simpson TL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Apr; 49(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 18385056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of validated bulbar redness grading scales.
    Schulze MM; Jones DA; Simpson TL
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 84(10):976-83. PubMed ID: 18049363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of ocular redness measurements obtained with keratograph 5M and correlation with subjective grading scales.
    Pérez-Bartolomé F; Sanz-Pozo C; Martínez-de la Casa JM; Arriola-Villalobos P; Fernández-Pérez C; García-Feijoó J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2018 Nov; 41(9):836-846. PubMed ID: 30293826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Bulbar Redness with a Newly Developed Keratograph.
    Wu S; Hong J; Tian L; Cui X; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Aug; 92(8):892-9. PubMed ID: 26099055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing ocular bulbar redness: a comparison of methods.
    Downie LE; Keller PR; Vingrys AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Mar; 36(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 26890702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How red is a white eye? Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia.
    Murphy PJ; Lau JS; Sim MM; Woods RL
    Eye (Lond); 2007 May; 21(5):633-8. PubMed ID: 16518366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new scale for the assessment of conjunctival bulbar redness.
    Macchi I; Bunya VY; Massaro-Giordano M; Stone RA; Maguire MG; Zheng Y; Chen M; Gee J; Smith E; Daniel E
    Ocul Surf; 2018 Oct; 16(4):436-440. PubMed ID: 29883738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of an objective method of measuring bulbar redness to the use of traditional grading scales.
    Sorbara L; Simpson T; Duench S; Schulze M; Fonn D
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Mar; 30(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 17254834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New clinical grading scales and objective measurement for conjunctival injection.
    Park IK; Chun YS; Kim KG; Yang HK; Hwang JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Aug; 54(8):5249-57. PubMed ID: 23833063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Ocular Redness Index: a novel automated method for measuring ocular injection.
    Amparo F; Wang H; Emami-Naeini P; Karimian P; Dana R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 54(7):4821-6. PubMed ID: 23766472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective grading of the anterior eye.
    Peterson RC; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 86(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 19165123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limbal and bulbar hyperaemia in normal eyes.
    Pult H; Murphy PJ; Purslow C; Nyman J; Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 18201331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The repeatability of discrete and continuous anterior segment grading scales.
    Chong E; Simpson T; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):244-51. PubMed ID: 10831214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading static versus dynamic images of contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Chaudry A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Sep; 90(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 17697182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of grading scales for contact lens complications.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Katsara SS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Jan; 21(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 11220037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying Ocular Surface Inflammation and Correlating It With Inflammatory Cell Infiltration In Vivo: A Novel Method.
    Ferrari G; Rabiolo A; Bignami F; Sizzano F; Palini A; Villa C; Rama P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Nov; 56(12):7067-75. PubMed ID: 26529042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated measurement of bulbar redness.
    Fieguth P; Simpson T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 11818375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.