165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21475641)
1. Acoustic responses of monodisperse lipid-encapsulated microbubble contrast agents produced by flow focusing.
Kaya M; Feingold S; Hettiarachchi K; Lee AP; Dayton PA
Bubble Sci Eng Technol; 2010 Dec; 2(2):33-40. PubMed ID: 21475641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved Sensitivity of Ultrasound-Based Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation Using Monodisperse Microbubbles.
van Hoeve W; de Vargas Serrano M; Te Winkel L; Forsberg F; Dave JK; Sarkar K; Wessner CE; Eisenbrey JR
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1781-1789. PubMed ID: 34724241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging.
Talu E; Hettiarachchi K; Zhao S; Powell RL; Lee AP; Longo ML; Dayton PA
Mol Imaging; 2007; 6(6):384-92. PubMed ID: 18053409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced microbubble contrast agent oscillation following 250 kHz insonation.
Ilovitsh T; Ilovitsh A; Foiret J; Caskey CF; Kusunose J; Fite BZ; Zhang H; Mahakian LM; Tam S; Butts-Pauly K; Qin S; Ferrara KW
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16347. PubMed ID: 30397280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitation of MRI sensitivity to quasi-monodisperse microbubble contrast agents for spatially resolved manometry.
Bencsik M; Al-Rwaili A; Morris R; Fairhurst DJ; Mundell V; Cave G; McKendry J; Evans S
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Nov; 70(5):1409-18. PubMed ID: 23233424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled Shrinkage of Microfluidically Generated Microbubbles by Tuning Lipid Concentration.
Zalloum IO; Paknahad AA; Kolios MC; Karshafian R; Tsai SSH
Langmuir; 2022 Nov; 38(43):13021-13029. PubMed ID: 36260341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the Superharmonic Response of Microbubble Contrast Agents for Acoustic Angiography as a Function of Microbubble Parameters.
Newsome IG; Kierski TM; Dayton PA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):2515-2524. PubMed ID: 31174922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential.
Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chirp excitation technique to enhance microbubble displacement induced by ultrasound radiation force.
Hu Y; Zhang D; Zheng H; Gong X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1410-15. PubMed ID: 19275298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity improvement of subharmonic-based pressure measurement using phospholipid-coated monodisperse microbubbles.
Wang P; Tan C; Ji X; Bai J; Yu ACH; Qin P
Ultrason Sonochem; 2024 Mar; 104():106830. PubMed ID: 38432151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonically induced dynamics of a contrast agent microbubble between two parallel elastic walls.
Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(19):6797-814. PubMed ID: 24018966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Backscattered ultrasound from contrast microbubbles: effects of tissue and bubble interaction.
Ressner M; Kvikliene A; Hoff L; Jurkonis R; Jansson T; Janerot-Sjoberg B; Lukosevicius A; Ask P
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():849-52. PubMed ID: 17271810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid Flooded Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device for in situ Generation of Monodisperse Microbubbles.
Dhanaliwala AH; Chen JL; Wang S; Hossack JA
Microfluid Nanofluidics; 2013 Mar; 14(3-4):457-467. PubMed ID: 23439786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.
Ital Heart J; 2004 Apr; 5(4):309-34. PubMed ID: 15185894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbubble oscillating in a microvessel filled with viscous fluid: A finite element modeling study.
Chen C; Gu Y; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Ultrasonics; 2016 Mar; 66():54-64. PubMed ID: 26651263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
