These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21476622)

  • 1. Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise.
    Coensel BD; Vanwetswinkel S; Botteldooren D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):EL148-53. PubMed ID: 21476622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustical characteristics of water sounds for soundscape enhancement in urban open spaces.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; You J; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2101-9. PubMed ID: 22423706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the soundscape quality of urban areas exposed to aircraft noise by adding moving water and vegetation.
    Lugten M; Karacaoglu M; White K; Kang J; Steemers K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):2906. PubMed ID: 30522313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; You J; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1357-66. PubMed ID: 20329835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes.
    Hong JY; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2026-36. PubMed ID: 23967935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in subjective loudness and annoyance depending on the road traffic noise spectrum.
    Torija AJ; Flindell IH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24437739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity and pleasantness assessments of water-fountain sounds recorded in urban public spaces.
    Ekman MR; Lundén P; Nilsson ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Nov; 138(5):3043-52. PubMed ID: 26627778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A principal components model of soundscape perception.
    Axelsson Ö; Nilsson ME; Berglund B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2836-46. PubMed ID: 21110579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise-induced annoyance from transportation noise: short-term responses to a single noise source in a laboratory.
    Kim J; Lim C; Hong J; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):804-14. PubMed ID: 20136203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of noise changes due to traffic speed control.
    Makarewicz R; Kokowski P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2074-81. PubMed ID: 17902845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Engineering modeling of traffic noise in shielded areas in cities.
    Salomons EM; Polinder H; Lohman WJ; Zhou H; Borst HC; Miedema HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2340-9. PubMed ID: 19894817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Annoyance due to single and combined sound exposure from railway and road traffic.
    Ohrström E; Barregård L; Andersson E; Skånberg A; Svensson H; Angerheim P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2642-52. PubMed ID: 18189556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of speech transmission in open public spaces affected by combined noises.
    Lee PJ; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 21786892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places?
    Pheasant R; Horoshenkov K; Watts G; Barrett B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1446-57. PubMed ID: 18345834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The interactive effects of traffic sound and window views on indoor soundscape perceptions in the residential area.
    Lu Y; Tan JKA; Hasegawa Y; Lau SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Feb; 153(2):972. PubMed ID: 36859134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise abatement and traffic safety: The trade-off of quieter engines and pavements on vehicle detection.
    Mendonça C; Freitas E; Ferreira JP; Raimundo ID; Santos JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():11-7. PubMed ID: 23182778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the masking effects of birdsong on the road traffic noise environment.
    Hao Y; Kang J; Wörtche H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):978. PubMed ID: 27586730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Community response to road traffic noise in the littoral region near Valencia (Spain).
    Uris A; Cervera F
    Int J Environ Health Res; 2001 Nov; 11(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 11798423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.