191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21476662)
1. Changes in amplitude and phase of distortion-product otoacoustic emission fine-structure and separated components during efferent activation.
Henin S; Thompson S; Abdelrazeq S; Long GR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2068-79. PubMed ID: 21476662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression.
Sun XM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4310-20. PubMed ID: 18537382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of three hours of discotheque music on pure-tone thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Müller J; Dietrich S; Janssen T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1853-69. PubMed ID: 20968358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
Deeter R; Abel R; Calandruccio L; Dhar S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2413-24. PubMed ID: 19894823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
Varghese GI; Zhu X; Frisina RD
Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children with sickle cell disease.
Stuart A; Preast JL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 22246207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech-in-noise intelligibility does not correlate with efferent olivocochlear reflex in humans with normal hearing.
Wagner W; Frey K; Heppelmann G; Plontke SK; Zenner HP
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jan; 128(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 17851961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory efferent feedback system deficits precede age-related hearing loss: contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in mice.
Zhu X; Vasilyeva ON; Kim S; Jacobson M; Romney J; Waterman MS; Tuttle D; Frisina RD
J Comp Neurol; 2007 Aug; 503(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 17559088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
Wagner W; Heyd A
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender, music, and distortion product otoacoustic emission components.
Torre P; Grace J; Hansen C; Millman P; Martin H
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):e74-81. PubMed ID: 23698624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
Sun XM
Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amplitude modulation of DPOAEs by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear.
Harrison RV; Sharma A; Brown T; Jiwani S; James AL
Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 128(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 18368574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
Sun XM; Shaver MD
Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative Middle Ear Pressure and Composite and Component Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
Thompson S; Henin S; Long GR
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 26049553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
