These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21476664)

  • 1. The enhancement effect: evidence for adaptation of inhibition using a binaural centering task.
    Byrne AJ; Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2088-94. PubMed ID: 21476664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence that adaptation of suppression cannot account for auditory enhancement or enhanced forward masking.
    Wright BA; McFadden D
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun; 336(1278):325-8; discussion 328-9. PubMed ID: 1354371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combination of masking releases for different center frequencies and masker amplitude statistics.
    Epp B; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2479-89. PubMed ID: 19894828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancement of increments in spectral amplitude: further evidence for a mechanism based on central adaptation.
    Carcagno S; Semal C; Demany L
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():175-82. PubMed ID: 23716222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Binaural release from masking in forward-masked intensity discrimination: evidence for effects of selective attention.
    Oberfeld D; Stahn P; Kuta M
    Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 294(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 23010335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No Need for Templates in the Auditory Enhancement Effect.
    Carcagno S; Semal C; Demany L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(6):e67874. PubMed ID: 23826348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects.
    Wright BA; McFadden D; Champlin CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 8354762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectral and level effects in auditory signal enhancement.
    Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ; Stellmack MA
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():167-74. PubMed ID: 23716221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Possible origins of the non-monotonic intensity discrimination function in forward masking.
    Zeng FG; Shannon RV
    Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 82(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 7775287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical representation of the combination of monaural and binaural unmasking.
    Uppenkamp S; Uhlig CH; Verhey JL
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():435-42. PubMed ID: 23716250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of hearing-impaired persons on auditory enhancement tasks.
    Thibodeau LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jun; 89(6):2843-50. PubMed ID: 1918628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T; Liberman MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wide-dynamic-range forward suppression in marmoset inferior colliculus neurons is generated centrally and accounts for perceptual masking.
    Nelson PC; Smith ZM; Young ED
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(8):2553-62. PubMed ID: 19244530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spectral interference in a binaural detection task: effects of masker bandwidth and temporal fringe.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):735-42. PubMed ID: 8370879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. II. Dependence on spectral parameters.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1089-104. PubMed ID: 11519577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.
    Lu T; Litovsky R; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1479-90. PubMed ID: 20329848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.