436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21476677)
1. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
Cao S; Li L; Wu X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of enhancement of spectral changes on speech intelligibility and clarity preferences for the hearing impaired.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr; 131(4):2987-98. PubMed ID: 22501075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
Chen F; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intelligibility of interrupted and interleaved speech for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implantees.
Gnansia D; Pressnitzer D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
Hear Res; 2010 Jun; 265(1-2):46-53. PubMed ID: 20197084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An ideal quantized mask to increase intelligibility and quality of speech in noise.
Healy EW; Vasko JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):1392. PubMed ID: 30424638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
