These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21476876)

  • 1. Silicone catheters may be superior to latex catheters in difficult urethral catheterization after urethral dilation.
    Villanueva C; Hossain SG; Nelson CA
    J Endourol; 2011 May; 25(5):841-4. PubMed ID: 21476876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the use of hydrogel coated latex versus all silicone urethral catheters after urethral reconstructive surgery.
    Erickson BA; Navai N; Patil M; Chang A; Gonzalez CM
    J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):203-6. PubMed ID: 18001794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 1: conventional foley catheters.
    Lawrence EL; Turner IG
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Feb; 17(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 16502247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of urethral reaction to full silicone, hydrogen-coated and siliconised latex catheters.
    Talja M; Korpela A; Järvi K
    Br J Urol; 1990 Dec; 66(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 2265339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Catheter induced urethral inflammatory reaction and urinary tract infection. An experimental and clinical study.
    Liedberg H
    Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl; 1989; 124():1-43. PubMed ID: 2633310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kink, flow and retention properties of urinary catheters part 2: novel design.
    Lawrence EL; Turner IG
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2006 Feb; 17(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16502248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Difficult male urethral catheterization: a review of different approaches.
    Villanueva C; Hemstreet GP
    Int Braz J Urol; 2008; 34(4):401-11; discussion 412. PubMed ID: 18778491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safer urethral catheters: how study of catheter balloon pressure and force can guide design.
    Wu AK; Blaschko SD; Garcia M; McAninch JW; Aaronson DS
    BJU Int; 2012 Apr; 109(7):1110-4. PubMed ID: 21871052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical performance of silicone and latex external condom catheters.
    Edlich RF; Bailey T; Pine SA; Williams R; Rodeheaver GT; Steers WD
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2000; 10(4):291-9. PubMed ID: 11194612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toxic catheters and diminished urethral blood circulation in the induction of urethral strictures.
    Talja M; Virtanen J; Andersson LC
    Eur Urol; 1986; 12(5):340-5. PubMed ID: 3780800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Silicone and latex urinary catheters cytotoxicity on primary cultured rabbit urothelial cells].
    Drewa T; Wolski Z; Gałazka P; Wozniak A; Olszewska-Słonina D; Sir J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2004 Mar; 16(93):228-31. PubMed ID: 15190597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of silicone and latex catheters in the development of urethral stricture after cardiac surgery.
    Ferrie BG; Groome J; Sethia B; Kirk D
    Br J Urol; 1986 Oct; 58(5):549-50. PubMed ID: 3490896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response of bladder and urethral mucosa to catheterization.
    Anderson RU
    JAMA; 1979 Aug; 242(5):451-3. PubMed ID: 448963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Zinc compounds in urethral catheters. A possible source of toxicity?
    Talja M; Saarela K; Ruutu M; Andersson LC; Alfthan O
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1993; 206():74-9. PubMed ID: 8291875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of silicon and latex urinary catheters: a comparative study].
    Huang WY; Wei LP; Ji YG; Xu DX; Mo JK
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1026-8. PubMed ID: 16109568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: A prospective, randomized trial evaluating the use of hydrogel coated latex versus all silicone urethral catheters after urethral reconstructive surgery. B. A. Erickson, N. Navai, M. Patil, A. Chang and C. M. Gonzalez. J Urol 2008; 179: 203-206.
    Panda A; Dorairajan LN; Nayak P; Kumar S
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):1185; author reply 1185-6. PubMed ID: 18639900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urinary catheter 'deflation cuff' formation: clinical audit and quantitative in vitro analysis.
    Parkin J; Scanlan J; Woolley M; Grover D; Evans A; Feneley RC
    BJU Int; 2002 Nov; 90(7):666-71. PubMed ID: 12410744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Foley catheter characteristics: predicting problems.
    Hendlin K; Meyers J; Monga M
    J Endourol; 2009 Jan; 23(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 19118460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The assessment of catheter-induced urethritis using an experimental dog model.
    Nacey JN; Delahunt B; Tulloch AG
    J Urol; 1985 Sep; 134(3):623-5. PubMed ID: 4032566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term catheter management: minimizing the problem of premature replacement due to balloon deflation.
    Barnes KE; Malone-Lee J
    J Adv Nurs; 1986 May; 11(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 3088078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.