1583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21477064)
1. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
Fortin T; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate function of partial fixed rehabilitation with axial and tilted implants having intrasinus insertion.
Agliardi EL; Tetè S; Romeo D; Malchiodi L; Gherlone E
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 May; 25(3):851-5. PubMed ID: 24820712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical characteristics and dimensions of edentulous sites in the posterior maxillae of patients referred for implant therapy.
Nunes LS; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 23593627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence, location, and size of maxillary sinus septa: panoramic radiograph versus computed tomography scan.
Maestre-Ferrín L; Carrillo-García C; Galán-Gil S; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Diago M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):507-11. PubMed ID: 21238847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prosthetically driven, computer-guided implant planning for the edentulous maxilla: a model study.
Katsoulis J; Pazera P; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):238-45. PubMed ID: 18783423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Palatal positioning of implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae.
Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Boronat A; Balaguer J; Peñarrocha M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 19587877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rehabilitation of Atrophied Low-Density Posterior Maxilla by Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Anitua E; Piñas L; Murias-Freijo A; Alkhraisat MH
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e1-2. PubMed ID: 26674905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.
Rajkumar GC; Aher V; Ramaiya S; Manjunath GS; Kumar DV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):526-30. PubMed ID: 23527355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative bone width of the edentulous maxillary ridge. Clinical implications of digital assessment in presurgical implant planning.
Katsoulis J; Enkling N; Takeichi T; Urban IA; Mericske-Stern R; Avrampou M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e213-23. PubMed ID: 22375945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts--a 3-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.
Fermergård R; Åstrand P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 19906268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Guided implant surgery and sinus lift in severely resorbed maxillae: A retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Pistilli R; Canullo L; Pesce P; Pistilli V; Caponio VCA; Sbricoli L
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104137. PubMed ID: 35461972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computer technology and medical imaging for immediate loading of implants in the pterygomaxillary region.
Balshi SF; Wolfinger GJ; Balshi TJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 16836166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Placement of posterior mandibular and maxillary implants in patients with severe bone deficiency: a clinical report of procedure.
Krekmanov L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11055139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating Maxillary Sinus Septa Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: Is There a Difference in Frequency and Type Between the Dentate and Edentulous Posterior Maxilla?
Schriber M; von Arx T; Sendi P; Jacobs R; Suter VG; Bornstein MM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(6):1324-1332. PubMed ID: 29140376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: a proof-of-concept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months.
Pozzi A; Sannino G; Barlattani A
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Nov; 108(5):286-97. PubMed ID: 23107236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography.
Maestre-Ferrín L; Galán-Gil S; Carrillo-García C; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):341-6. PubMed ID: 21483887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
