213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21477282)
1. Optimally splitting cases for training and testing high dimensional classifiers.
Dobbin KK; Simon RM
BMC Med Genomics; 2011 Apr; 4():31. PubMed ID: 21477282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Classifier performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1559-70. PubMed ID: 18491550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An adaptive optimal ensemble classifier via bagging and rank aggregation with applications to high dimensional data.
Datta S; Pihur V; Datta S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 11():427. PubMed ID: 20716381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An active learning based classification strategy for the minority class problem: application to histopathology annotation.
Doyle S; Monaco J; Feldman M; Tomaszewski J; Madabhushi A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Oct; 12():424. PubMed ID: 22034914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Boosting for high-dimensional two-class prediction.
Blagus R; Lusa L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():300. PubMed ID: 26390865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Class prediction for high-dimensional class-imbalanced data.
Blagus R; Lusa L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():523. PubMed ID: 20961420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How large a training set is needed to develop a classifier for microarray data?
Dobbin KK; Zhao Y; Simon RM
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Jan; 14(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 18172259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sample size requirements for training high-dimensional risk predictors.
Dobbin KK; Song X
Biostatistics; 2013 Sep; 14(4):639-52. PubMed ID: 23873895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multi-factorial analysis of class prediction error: estimating optimal number of biomarkers for various classification rules.
Khondoker MR; Bachmann TT; Mewissen M; Dickinson P; Dobrzelecki B; Campbell CJ; Mount AR; Walton AJ; Crain J; Schulze H; Giraud G; Ross AJ; Ciani I; Ember SW; Tlili C; Terry JG; Grant E; McDonnell N; Ghazal P
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Dec; 8(6):945-65. PubMed ID: 21121020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Random forests ensemble classifier trained with data resampling strategy to improve cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis.
Ozçift A
Comput Biol Med; 2011 May; 41(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 21419401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficient optimal linear boosting of a pair of classifiers.
Boyarshinov V; Magdon-Ismail M
IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2007 Mar; 18(2):317-28. PubMed ID: 17385622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.
Hua J; Xiong Z; Lowey J; Suh E; Dougherty ER
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1509-15. PubMed ID: 15572470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Win percentage: a novel measure for assessing the suitability of machine classifiers for biological problems.
Parry RM; Phan JH; Wang MD
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S7. PubMed ID: 22536905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A hierarchical Naïve Bayes Model for handling sample heterogeneity in classification problems: an application to tissue microarrays.
Demichelis F; Magni P; Piergiorgi P; Rubin MA; Bellazzi R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Nov; 7():514. PubMed ID: 17125514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Error margin analysis for feature gene extraction.
Chow CK; Zhu HL; Lacy J; Kuo WP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():241. PubMed ID: 20459827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Derivation of an artificial gene to improve classification accuracy upon gene selection.
Seo M; Oh S
Comput Biol Chem; 2012 Feb; 36():1-12. PubMed ID: 22340439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An entropy-based gene selection method for cancer classification using microarray data.
Liu X; Krishnan A; Mondry A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 6():76. PubMed ID: 15790388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
