These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21477815)

  • 1. Sensitivity to spacing changes in faces and nonface objects in preschool-aged children and adults.
    Macchi Cassia V; Turati C; Schwarzer G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Aug; 109(4):454-67. PubMed ID: 21477815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of sensitivity to spacing versus feature changes in pictures of houses: Evidence for slow development of a general spacing detection mechanism?
    Robbins RA; Shergill Y; Maurer D; Lewis TL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Jul; 109(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 21397248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of inversion on 3- to 5-year-olds' recognition of face and nonface visual objects.
    Picozzi M; Cassia VM; Turati C; Vescovo E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Apr; 102(4):487-502. PubMed ID: 19111316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Limitations in 4-year-old children's sensitivity to the spacing among facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Thomson K
    Child Dev; 2008; 79(5):1513-23. PubMed ID: 18826539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness.
    McKone E; Boyer BL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Jun; 94(2):134-62. PubMed ID: 16483596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: evidence from the composite effect.
    Cassia VM; Picozzi M; Kuefner D; Bricolo E; Turati C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Mar; 12(2):236-48. PubMed ID: 19143797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Becoming a face expert.
    Mondloch CJ; Maurer D; Ahola S
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Nov; 17(11):930-4. PubMed ID: 17176421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition and sex categorization of adults' and children's faces: examining performance in the absence of sex-stereotyped cues.
    Wild HA; Barrett SE; Spence MJ; O'Toole AJ; Cheng YD; Brooke J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Dec; 77(4):269-91. PubMed ID: 11063629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving time discrimination in children and adults in a temporal bisection task: the effects of feedback and no forced choice on decision and memory processes.
    Droit-Volet S; Izaute M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1173-88. PubMed ID: 19034811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. No own-age bias in 3-year-old children: more evidence for the role of early experience in building face-processing biases.
    Macchi Cassia V; Pisacane A; Gava L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Nov; 113(3):372-82. PubMed ID: 22857798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and me: insensitivity to the spacing among features at 4 years of age.
    Mondloch CJ; Leis A; Maurer D
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 16460536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acquired prosopagnosia as a face-specific disorder: ruling out the general visual similarity account.
    Busigny T; Graf M; Mayer E; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2051-67. PubMed ID: 20362595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring children's face-space: a multidimensional scaling analysis of the mental representation of facial identity.
    Nishimura M; Maurer D; Gao X
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):355-75. PubMed ID: 19342062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The development of perceptual sensitivity to second-order facial relations in children.
    Baudouin JY; Gallay M; Durand K; Robichon F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):195-206. PubMed ID: 20598706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.
    Rossion B; Caharel S
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship between discrimination and memory for spacing and feature changes in houses.
    Robbins RA; Lewis TL; Maurer D
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(2):153-169. PubMed ID: 29608413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 15811237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cambridge Car Memory Test: a task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects.
    Dennett HW; McKone E; Tavashmi R; Hall A; Pidcock M; Edwards M; Duchaine B
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):587-605. PubMed ID: 22012343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.