These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21477908)

  • 1. Motor execution affects action prediction.
    Springer A; Brandstädter S; Liepelt R; Birngruber T; Giese M; Mechsner F; Prinz W
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 21477908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting point-light actions in real-time.
    Graf M; Reitzner B; Corves C; Casile A; Giese M; Prinz W
    Neuroimage; 2007; 36 Suppl 2():T22-32. PubMed ID: 17499167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic simulation and static matching for action prediction: evidence from body part priming.
    Springer A; Brandstädter S; Prinz W
    Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 37(5):936-52. PubMed ID: 23692214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of selective attention in matching observed and executed actions.
    Chong TT; Cunnington R; Williams MA; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):786-95. PubMed ID: 19124033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pickup of essential kinematics underpins expert perception of movement patterns.
    Abernethy B; Zawi K
    J Mot Behav; 2007 Sep; 39(5):353-67. PubMed ID: 17827113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual preference for isochronic movement does not necessarily emerge from movement kinematics: a challenge for the motor simulation theory.
    Bidet-Ildei C; Méary D; Orliaguet JP
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 18054435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subliminal display of action words interferes with motor planning: a combined EEG and kinematic study.
    Boulenger V; Silber BY; Roy AC; Paulignan Y; Jeannerod M; Nazir TA
    J Physiol Paris; 2008; 102(1-3):130-6. PubMed ID: 18485678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task.
    Vesper C; Soutschek A; Schubo A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2418-32. PubMed ID: 19499488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Action simulation for others is not constrained by one's own postures.
    Fischer MH
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 15488902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors that affect action possibility judgements: recent experience with the action and the current body state.
    Chandrasekharan S; Binsted G; Ayres F; Higgins L; Welsh TN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):976-93. PubMed ID: 22348464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual features of an observed agent do not modulate human brain activity during action observation.
    Turella L; Erb M; Grodd W; Castiello U
    Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(3):844-53. PubMed ID: 19285143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual movement constraints of others modulate motor preparation in the observer.
    Liepelt R; Ullsperger M; Obst K; Spengler S; von Cramon DY; Brass M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):268-75. PubMed ID: 18680755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What activates the human mirror neuron system during observation of artificial movements: bottom-up visual features or top-down intentions?
    Engel A; Burke M; Fiehler K; Bien S; Rösler F
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2033-42. PubMed ID: 18339409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory-motor interference abolishes repetition priming for observed actions, but not for action-related verbs.
    Busiello M; Costantini M; Galati G; Committeri G
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Apr; 492(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 21281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.
    Blakemore SJ; Frith C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 15707910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imitative response tendencies following observation of intransitive actions.
    Bertenthal BI; Longo MR; Kosobud A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):210-25. PubMed ID: 16634666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement.
    Juravle G; Deubel H; Tan HZ; Spence C
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 208(2):391-401. PubMed ID: 20018212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution.
    Bouquet CA; Gaurier V; Shipley T; Toussaint L; Blandin Y
    J Sports Sci; 2007 Mar; 25(5):519-30. PubMed ID: 17365539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What part of an action interferes with ongoing perception?
    Zwickel J; Grosjean M; Prinz W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):403-9. PubMed ID: 20472224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of imagined movement speed on subsequent motor performance.
    Louis M; Guillot A; Maton S; Doyon J; Collet C
    J Mot Behav; 2008 Mar; 40(2):117-32. PubMed ID: 18400678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.