110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21477958)
1. Clinical impact of BI-RADS classification in Taiwanese breast cancer patients: BI-RADS 5 versus BI-RADS 0-4.
Kuo YL; Cheng L; Chang TW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1504-7. PubMed ID: 21477958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients.
Kim JY; Jung EJ; Park T; Jeong SH; Jeong CY; Ju YT; Lee YJ; Hong SC; Ha WS; Choi SK
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 May; 45(5):411-5. PubMed ID: 25670765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinicopathological features of triple-negative breast cancer in Taiwanese women.
Yao-Lung K; Dar-Ren C; Tsai-Wang C
Int J Clin Oncol; 2011 Oct; 16(5):500-5. PubMed ID: 21455625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 10-year follow-up of triple-negative breast cancer patients in Taiwan.
Lin C; Chien SY; Kuo SJ; Chen LS; Chen ST; Lai HW; Chang TW; Chen DR
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Mar; 42(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 22287721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical features and prognosis analysis of different breast cancer molecular subtypes].
Yang Q; Chen J; Li HJ; Yu M; Tian CX; Lü Q
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21575463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic value of phosphorylated HER2 in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.
Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Yamashita T; Shimo T; Mizutoh A; Moriya T; Sonoo H
Breast Cancer; 2015 May; 22(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 23749689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prognostic value of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 in node positive breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy].
Wang SL; Li YX; Song YW; Wang WH; Jin J; Liu YP; Liu XF; Yu ZH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 32(7):520-5. PubMed ID: 21029696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of breast cancer with estrogen- and progesterone-receptor negative and HER-2 overexpression].
Fan Y; Guan Y; Zhao WH; Li Q; Xu BH
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 30(12):917-20. PubMed ID: 19173993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. LEA-135 expression: its association with a lower risk of recurrence and increased overall survival of patients with lymph node-positive primary invasive breast cancer.
Saha B; Zhang N; Naritoku WY; Tsao-Wei DD; Groshen SL; Carlsson G; Larsson L; Gustavsson B; Chaiwun B; Taylor CR; Imam SA
Anticancer Res; 2004; 24(4):2391-400. PubMed ID: 15330189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. TIF1γ interferes with TGFβ1/SMAD4 signaling to promote poor outcome in operable breast cancer patients.
Kassem L; Deygas M; Fattet L; Lopez J; Goulvent T; Lavergne E; Chabaud S; Carrabin N; Chopin N; Bachelot T; Gillet G; Treilleux I; Rimokh R
BMC Cancer; 2015 Jun; 15():453. PubMed ID: 26040677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is conservative surgery a good option for patients with "triple negative" breast cancer?
Martinez-Ramos D; Escrig-Sos J; Torrella-Ramos A; Alcalde-Sanchez M; Salvador-Sanchis JL
Breast; 2012 Jun; 21(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 22579462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?
Evans AJ; Pinder SE; James JJ; Ellis IO; Cornford E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):1377-80. PubMed ID: 17056932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma.
Gokce H; Durak MG; Akin MM; Canda T; Balci P; Ellidokuz H; Demirkan B; Gorken IB; Sevinc AI; Kocdor MA; Saydam S; Harmancioglu O
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 23714006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
Varas X; Leborgne JH; Leborgne F; Mezzera J; Jaumandreu S; Leborgne F
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 12185047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multivariate analysis of bcl-2, apoptosis, P53 and HER-2/neu in breast cancer: a short-term follow-up.
el-Ahmady O; el-Salahy E; Mahmoud M; Wahab MA; Eissa S; Khalifa A
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(4):2493-9. PubMed ID: 12174951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Analysis of the results of mammography screening in Dubrovnik-Neretva County in the 2006-2009 period].
Dzono-Boban A; Mratović MC; Masanović M
Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 21692270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic impact of cathepsin D and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in a subgroup of node-negative breast cancer patients with low histological grade tumors.
Gaci Z; Bouin-Pineau MH; Gaci M; Daban A; Ingrand P; Métayé T
Int J Oncol; 2001 Apr; 18(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 11251176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prognostic model based on combining estrogen receptor expression and Ki-67 value after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in locally advanced breast cancer: extension and analysis of a previously reported cohort of patients.
Miglietta L; Morabito F; Provinciali N; Canobbio L; Meszaros P; Naso C; Murialdo R; Boitano M; Salvi S; Ferrarini M
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1046-52. PubMed ID: 23890870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
