134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21478329)
1. A point-of-care clinical trial comparing insulin administered using a sliding scale versus a weight-based regimen.
Fiore LD; Brophy M; Ferguson RE; D'Avolio L; Hermos JA; Lew RA; Doros G; Conrad CH; O'Neil JA; Sabin TP; Kaufman J; Swartz SL; Lawler E; Liang MH; Gaziano JM; Lavori PW
Clin Trials; 2011 Apr; 8(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 21478329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical issues in pragmatic trials: the implementation of the Diuretic Comparison Project.
Ferguson RE; Leatherman SM; Woods P; Hau C; Lew R; Cushman WC; Brophy MT; Fiore L; Ishani A
Clin Trials; 2023 Jun; 20(3):276-283. PubMed ID: 36992530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recruitment of veterans from primary care into a physical activity randomized controlled trial: the experience of the VA-STRIDE study.
Hawkins MS; Hough LJ; Berger MA; Mor MK; Steenkiste AR; Gao S; Stone RA; Burkitt KH; Marcus BH; Ciccolo JT; Kriska AM; Klinvex DT; Sevick MA
Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():11. PubMed ID: 24398076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory.
Weinfurt KP; Hernandez AF; Coronado GD; DeBar LL; Dember LM; Green BB; Heagerty PJ; Huang SS; James KT; Jarvik JG; Larson EB; Mor V; Platt R; Rosenthal GE; Septimus EJ; Simon GE; Staman KL; Sugarman J; Vazquez M; Zatzick D; Curtis LH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):144. PubMed ID: 28923013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
Armstrong K
J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect.
Heo M; Meissner P; Litwin AH; Arnsten JH; McKee MD; Karasz A; McKinley P; Rehm CD; Chambers EC; Yeh MC; Wylie-Rosett J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):626-640. PubMed ID: 29121828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An Approach to Assess Generalizability in Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Case Study of the Whole Systems Demonstrator Cluster Randomized Trial Comparing Telehealth with Usual Care for Patients with Chronic Health Conditions.
Steventon A; Grieve R; Bardsley M
Med Decis Making; 2015 Nov; 35(8):1023-36. PubMed ID: 25986472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending the vision of adaptive point-of-care platform trials to improve targeted use of drug therapy regimens: An agile approach in the learning healthcare system toolkit.
Hirsch G; Velentgas P; Curtis JR; Larholt K; Park JJH; Pashos CL; Trinquart L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Oct; 133():107327. PubMed ID: 37652359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical reasoning in pragmatic trial randomization: a qualitative interview study.
Clapp JT; Dinh C; Hsu M; Neuman MD
Trials; 2023 Jun; 24(1):431. PubMed ID: 37365614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The paradox of equipoise: the principle that drives and limits therapeutic discoveries in clinical research.
Djulbegovic B
Cancer Control; 2009 Oct; 16(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 19910921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Similarities and Differences Between Pragmatic Trials and Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trials.
Fortney JC; Curran GM; Lyon AR; Check DK; Flum DR
J Gen Intern Med; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38627320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VA Lessons From Partnering in COVID-19 Clinical Trials.
Caroff K; Davey VJ; Smyth M; Huang GD
Fed Pract; 2023 Nov; 40(11 Suppl 5):S18-S22. PubMed ID: 38577304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Building Research Infrastructure to Develop Greater Learning Efficiencies (BRIDGE).
Elbers DC; Fillmore NR; La J; Tosi HM; Ajjarapu S; Dhond R; Murray K; Valley D; Shannon C; Brophy MT; Do NV
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Jan; 310():1131-1135. PubMed ID: 38269991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implementation of statistical features of a Bayesian two-armed responsive adaptive randomization trial with post hoc analysis of time trend drift.
Shergina E; Richter KP; Zhang C; Mussulman L; Nazir N; Gajewski BJ
J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jun; ():1-15. PubMed ID: 38847351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical methods for analyzing sequentially randomized trials.
Bembom O; van der Laan MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Nov; 99(21):1577-82. PubMed ID: 17971533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pragmatic trials can be designed as optimal medical care: principles and methods of care trials.
Raymond J; Darsaut TE; Altman DG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 67(10):1150-6. PubMed ID: 25042688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials and Learning Health Systems in Pain Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges.
Salmasi V; Terkawi AS; Mackey SC
Anesthesiol Clin; 2023 Jun; 41(2):503-517. PubMed ID: 37245953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive designs for comparative effectiveness research trials.
Kairalla JA; Coffey CS; Thomann MA; Shorr RI; Muller KE
Clin Res Regul Aff; 2015; 32(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 27773984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management of Critical Glucose Values in Hospice.
Dakroub B; DiScala SL; Vartan CM; Miller MF; Silverman M; Chalavarya S
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2023 Dec; ():10499091231223748. PubMed ID: 38128586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Barriers to Implementing an Insulin Order Form In a Non-ICU Medical Unit.
Arif SA; Escaño AK
P T; 2010 Jan; 35(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 20182560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
