These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21478424)

  • 1. Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destination.
    Wood F; Kowalczuk J; Elwyn G; Mitchell C; Gallacher J
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Aug; 37(8):487-92. PubMed ID: 21478424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
    Kaufman DJ; Baker R; Milner LC; Devaney S; Hudson KL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160461. PubMed ID: 27532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease.
    Arar NH; Hazuda H; Steinbach R; Arar MY; Abboud HE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 16157258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study.
    Kennedy MR; Huxtable R; Birchley G; Ives J; Craddock I
    JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e25227. PubMed ID: 34842551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research.
    Carson C; Hinton L; Kurinczuk J; Quigley M
    BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e026469. PubMed ID: 31152033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Why do people consent to participate in genetic epidemiological studies?].
    Matsui K; Kita Y
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 57(11):977-87. PubMed ID: 21348275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysis.
    Matsui K; Kita Y; Ueshima H
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):385-92. PubMed ID: 15994356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK.
    Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
    Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public attitudes toward health information exchange: perceived benefits and concerns.
    Dimitropoulos L; Patel V; Scheffler SA; Posnack S
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Dec; 17(12 Spec No.):SP111-6. PubMed ID: 22216769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study.
    Melas PA; Sjöholm LK; Forsner T; Edhborg M; Juth N; Forsell Y; Lavebratt C
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Feb; 36(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 20133403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials.
    Locock L; Smith L
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 21163854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do privacy and security regulations need a status update? Perspectives from an intergenerational survey.
    Pereira S; Robinson JO; Peoples HA; Gutierrez AM; Majumder MA; McGuire AL; Rothstein MA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184525. PubMed ID: 28926626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens.
    Page SA; Manhas KP; Muruve DA
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 27527514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approaches to community consultation in exception from informed consent: Analysis of scope, efficiency, and cost at two centers.
    Eubank L; Lee KS; Seder DB; Strout T; Darrow M; MacDonald C; May T; Riker RR; Kern KB
    Resuscitation; 2018 Sep; 130():81-87. PubMed ID: 29964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research.
    Platt J; Bollinger J; Dvoskin R; Kardia SL; Kaufman D
    Genet Med; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23660530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.
    King T; Brankovic L; Gillard P
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 Apr; 81(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 22306206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes towards Personal Genomics and Sharing of Genetic Data among Older Swiss Adults: A Qualitative Study.
    Mählmann L; Schee Gen Halfmann S; von Wyl A; Brand A
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(5):293-306. PubMed ID: 29414817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of Attitudes of Japanese Women Toward Genetic/Genomic Research.
    Moriya H; Inoue I; Ikeuchi M; Ishii N; Motojima M
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):29-38. PubMed ID: 26251854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using community-based participatory research principles to develop more understandable recruitment and informed consent documents in genomic research.
    Skinner HG; Calancie L; Vu MB; Garcia B; DeMarco M; Patterson C; Ammerman A; Schisler JC
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125466. PubMed ID: 25938669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.