These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21478424)
21. Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research. Hull SC; Sharp RR; Botkin JR; Brown M; Hughes M; Sugarman J; Schwinn D; Sankar P; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge BR; Wilfond BS Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):62-70. PubMed ID: 19003716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank. Broekstra R; Maeckelberghe ELM; Aris-Meijer JL; Stolk RP; Otten S BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 32711531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Beliefs and attitudes towards participating in genetic research - a population based cross-sectional study. Kerath SM; Klein G; Kern M; Shapira I; Witthuhn J; Norohna N; Kline M; Baksh F; Gregersen P; Taioli E BMC Public Health; 2013 Feb; 13():114. PubMed ID: 23388465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Online Education and e-Consent for GeneScreen, a Preventive Genomic Screening Study. Cadigan RJ; Butterfield R; Rini C; Waltz M; Kuczynski KJ; Muessig K; Goddard KAB; Henderson GE Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(4):235-246. PubMed ID: 29069655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients' perspectives. Small SS; Lau E; McFarlane K; Archambault PM; Longstaff H; Hohl CM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 May; 23(1):113. PubMed ID: 37170077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trust and Expectations of Researchers and Public Health Departments for the Use of HIV Molecular Epidemiology. Schairer CE; Mehta SR; Vinterbo SA; Hoenigl M; Kalichman M; Little SJ AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2019; 10(3):201-213. PubMed ID: 31050604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Race, Trust in Doctors, Privacy Concerns, and Consent Preferences for Biobanks. Hong SJ; Drake B; Goodman M; Kaphingst KA Health Commun; 2020 Sep; 35(10):1219-1228. PubMed ID: 31167570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reasons for participation in pain research: can they indicate a lack of informed consent? Wasan AD; Taubenberger SP; Robinson WM Pain Med; 2009 Jan; 10(1):111-9. PubMed ID: 18657219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Emergency research: using exception from informed consent, evaluation of community consultations. Govindarajan P; Dickert NW; Meeker M; De Souza N; Harney D; Hemphill CJ; Pentz R Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 20(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23570483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from genetic research. Fong M; Braun KL; Chang RM J Cancer Educ; 2006; 21(1 Suppl):S47-52. PubMed ID: 17020502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank. Petersen A Sociol Health Illn; 2005 Mar; 27(2):271-92. PubMed ID: 15787778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Who are your public? A survey comparing the views of a population-based sample with those of a community-based public forum in Scotland. Emslie MJ; Andrew J; Angus V; Entwistle V; Walker K Health Soc Care Community; 2005 Mar; 13(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15717918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. Goldenberg AJ; Hull SC; Botkin JR; Wilfond BS J Pediatr; 2009 Oct; 155(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 19595370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ethical aspects of participation in the database of genotypes and phenotypes of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: the Cancer and Leukemia Group B Experience. Peppercorn J; Shapira I; Deshields T; Kroetz D; Friedman P; Spears P; Collyar DE; Shulman LN; Dressler L; Bertagnolli MM Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5060-8. PubMed ID: 22415847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The random dialing survey as a tool for community consultation for research involving the emergency medicine exception from informed consent. Bulger EM; Schmidt TA; Cook AJ; Brasel KJ; Griffiths DE; Kudenchuk PJ; Davis D; Bardarson B; Idris AH; Aufderheide TP; Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Mar; 53(3):341-50, 350.e1-2. PubMed ID: 18824274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A qualitative study of the views of patients with human immunodeficiency virus and childhood trauma on the consent process for a neurocognitive and neuroimaging study. Bates H; Seedat S; Lester H Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2014 Oct; 15(4):362-74. PubMed ID: 24252666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries. Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consent Issues in Genetic Research: Views of Research Participants. Goodman D; Johnson CO; Wenzel L; Bowen D; Condit C; Edwards KL Public Health Genomics; 2016; 19(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 27376949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent and subject motivation to participate in a large, population-based genomics study: the Marshfield Clinic Personalized Medicine Research Project. McCarty CA; Nair A; Austin DM; Giampietro PF Community Genet; 2007; 10(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 17167244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]