These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21478424)
41. Patients' opinions on privacy, consent and the disclosure of health information for medical research. Page SA; Mitchell I Chronic Dis Can; 2006; 27(2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16867240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Does the current consent process minimize the risks of genetics research? Wendler D; Prasad K; Wilfond B Am J Med Genet; 2002 Dec; 113(3):258-62. PubMed ID: 12439893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Employees' perspectives on ethically important aspects of genetic research participation: a pilot study. Roberts LW; Warner TD; Geppert CM; Rogers M; Green Hammond KA Compr Psychiatry; 2005; 46(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15714191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. How patients and visitors to an urban emergency department view clinical research. Wilets I; O'Rourke M; Nassisi D Acad Emerg Med; 2003 Oct; 10(10):1081-5. PubMed ID: 14525741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. "I Always Vet Things": Navigating Privacy and the Presentation of Self on Health Discussion Boards Among Individuals with Long-Term Conditions. Brady E; Segar J; Sanders C J Med Internet Res; 2016 Oct; 18(10):e274. PubMed ID: 27737819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Personal health information in research: Perceived risk, trustworthiness and opinions from patients attending a tertiary healthcare facility. Krahe M; Milligan E; Reilly S J Biomed Inform; 2019 Jul; 95():103222. PubMed ID: 31176040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Psychological factors that determine people's willingness-to-share genetic data for research. Bearth A; Siegrist M Clin Genet; 2020 Mar; 97(3):483-491. PubMed ID: 31833061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Re-use of medical data for research. What do the Dutch think of the requirement for explicit consent?]. Coppen R; Groenewegen PP; Hazes JM; de Jong JD; Kievit J; de Neeling JN; Reijneveld SA; Verheij RA; Vroom E Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2015; 160():A9868. PubMed ID: 27027208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Public Perceptions of Overlapping Surgery. Kent M; Whyte R; Fleishman A; Tomich D; Forrow L; Rodrigue J J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):771-778.e4. PubMed ID: 28196693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A consumer register: an acceptable and cost-effective alternative for accessing patient populations. Bryant J; Sanson-Fisher R; Fradgley E; Hobden B; Zucca A; Henskens F; Searles A; Webb B; Oldmeadow C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):134. PubMed ID: 27724888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Learning from older peoples' reasons for participating in demanding, intensive epidemiological studies: a qualitative study. Baczynska AM; Shaw SC; Patel HP; Sayer AA; Roberts HC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):167. PubMed ID: 29233101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns. Freeman BD; Butler K; Bolcic-Jankovic D; Clarridge BR; Kennedy CR; LeBlanc J; Chandros Hull S Chest; 2015 Apr; 147(4):979-988. PubMed ID: 25340645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Citizens' views on sharing their health data: the role of competence, reliability and pursuing the common good. Rivas Velarde MC; Tsantoulis P; Burton-Jeangros C; Aceti M; Chappuis P; Hurst-Majno S BMC Med Ethics; 2021 May; 22(1):62. PubMed ID: 34006284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Trust in Centralized Large-Scale Data Repository: A Qualitative Analysis. Broekstra R; Aris-Meijer J; Maeckelberghe E; Stolk R; Otten S J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):365-378. PubMed ID: 31738093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Using provocative design to foster electronic informed consent innovation. De Sutter E; Verreydt S; Yskout K; Geerts D; Borry P; Outtier A; Ferrante M; Vandermeulen C; Vanmechelen N; Van der Schueren B; Huys I BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Nov; 22(1):296. PubMed ID: 36397108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Why do people participate in epidemiological research? Slegers C; Zion D; Glass D; Kelsall H; Fritschi L; Brown N; Loff B J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Jun; 12(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 25672617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Participants' Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles. Condit CM; Shen L; Edwards KL; Bowen DJ; Korngiebel DM; Johnson CO J Health Commun; 2016; 21(sup2):16-24. PubMed ID: 27653592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effect of ethnicity, gender and drug use history on achieving high rates of affirmative informed consent for genetics research: impact of sharing with a national repository. Ray B; Jackson C; Ducat E; Ho A; Hamon S; Kreek MJ J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):374-9. PubMed ID: 21266386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Attitudes of healthy volunteers to genetic testing in phase 1 clinical trials. Levesque S; Polasek TM; Haan E; Shakib S F1000Res; 2021; 10():259. PubMed ID: 35136570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. "They were already inside my head to begin with": Trust, Translational Misconception, and Intraoperative Brain Research. Peabody Smith A; Taiclet L; Ebadi H; Levy L; Weber M; Caruso EM; Pouratian N; Feinsinger A AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2023; 14(2):111-124. PubMed ID: 36137012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]