These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21478476)

  • 1. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.
    Hammond D; Doxey J; Daniel S; Bansal-Travers M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Jul; 13(7):579-88. PubMed ID: 21486994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?
    Germain D; Wakefield MA; Durkin SJ
    J Adolesc Health; 2010 Apr; 46(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 20307829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes?
    Wakefield M; Germain D; Durkin S; Hammond D; Goldberg M; Borland R
    Addiction; 2012 Jun; 107(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22372966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
    White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.
    Mutti S; Hammond D; Reid JL; White CM; Thrasher JF
    Health Promot Int; 2017 Aug; 32(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 26826368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.
    Borland R; Savvas S; Sharkie F; Moore K
    Tob Control; 2013 Mar; 22(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22166265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, 'plain' cigarette packaging.
    Hammond D; White C; Anderson W; Arnott D; Dockrell M
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Aug; 24(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 24108274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2014 Jan; 23(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23436139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptions of plain packaging and health warning labels for cannabis among young adults: findings from an experimental study.
    Mutti-Packer S; Collyer B; Hodgins DC
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Dec; 18(1):1361. PubMed ID: 30526539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of cigarette branding and plain packaging on perceptions of product appeal and risk among young adults in Norway: A between-subjects experimental survey.
    Scheffels J; Lund I
    BMJ Open; 2013 Dec; 3(12):e003732. PubMed ID: 24309171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
    Hammond D; Dockrell M; Arnott D; Lee A; McNeill A
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Dec; 19(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 19726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.
    Hoek J; Wong C; Gendall P; Louviere J; Cong K
    Tob Control; 2011 May; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20966135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.
    McNeill A; Gravely S; Hitchman SC; Bauld L; Hammond D; Hartmann-Boyce J
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 4(4):CD011244. PubMed ID: 28447363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.
    Lund I; Scheffels J
    BMC Public Health; 2013 Oct; 13():1005. PubMed ID: 24156515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24920573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.