BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21479277)

  • 1. Retentive characteristics of overdenture attachments during repeated dislodging and cyclic loading.
    Chung KH; Whiting D; Kronstrom M; Chan D; Wataha J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21479277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive characteristics of Ankylos SynCone conical crown system over long-term use in vitro.
    Zhang RG; Hannak WB; Roggensack M; Freesmeyer WB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 18637380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W; Kousvelari E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 9109267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of load distribution for implant overdenture attachments.
    Porter JA; Petropoulos VC; Brunski JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 12381065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resistance to wear of four matrices with ball attachments for implant overdentures: a fatigue study.
    Branchi R; Vangi D; Virga A; Guertin G; Fazi G
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):614-9. PubMed ID: 20546492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simple, predictable intraoral technique for retentive mechanism attachment of implant overdenture attachments.
    Daher T
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 12(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 14508743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
    Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
    Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.