These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21479744)
1. Feasibility and safety of endovascular stripping of totally implantable venous access devices. Heye S; Maleux G; Goossens GA; Vaninbroukx J; Jerôme M; Stas M Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):607-12. PubMed ID: 21479744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experience at a single institution with endovascular treatment of mechanical complications caused by implanted central venous access devices in pediatric and adult patients. Bessoud B; de Baere T; Kuoch V; Desruennes E; Cosset MF; Lassau N; Roche A AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 12540466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of functional complications of totally implantable venous access devices by an advanced practice nursing team: 5 years of clinical experience. Goossens GA; Stas M; Moons P Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2012 Dec; 16(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 22265937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Restoration of patency in failing tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison of catheter exchange, exchange and balloon disruption of the fibrin sheath, and femoral stripping. Janne d'Othée B; Tham JC; Sheiman RG J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):1011-5. PubMed ID: 16778235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications. Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications. Di Carlo I; Pulvirenti E; Mannino M; Toro A Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):1649-56. PubMed ID: 20204533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients. Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Percutaneous retrieval of dislodged totally implantable central venous access system in 92 cases: experience in a single hospital. Cheng CC; Tsai TN; Yang CC; Han CL Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):346-50. PubMed ID: 17976941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of radiologically totally implanted central venous access ports of the upper arm: long-term complications in 127,750 catheter-days. Busch JD; Herrmann J; Heller F; Derlin T; Koops A; Adam G; Habermann CR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 22826411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The catheter is stuck: complications experienced during removal of a totally implantable venous access device. A single-center study in 200 children. Wilson GJ; van Noesel MM; Hop WC; van de Ven C J Pediatr Surg; 2006 Oct; 41(10):1694-8. PubMed ID: 17011271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Replacement of inadvertently discontinued tunneled jugular high-flow central catheters with tract recannulation: technical results and outcome. Saad NE; Saad WE; Davies MG; Waldman DL J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):890-6. PubMed ID: 18503904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters. Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Goltz JP; Scholl A; Ritter CO; Wittenberg G; Hahn D; Kickuth R Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Dec; 33(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 20414657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Implantable catheter systems. Experiences with 1000 patients with central venous ports]. Kock HJ; Krause U; Pietsch M; Rasfeld S; Walz MK Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jan; 121(3):47-51. PubMed ID: 8565809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct translumbar inferior vena cava ports for long-term central venous access in patients with cancer. Butros SR; Walker TG; Salazar GM; Kalva SP; Oklu R; Wicky S; Ganguli S J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):556-60. PubMed ID: 24507994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques]. Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endovascular revascularization of chronically thrombosed arteriovenous fistulas and grafts for hemodialysis: a retrospective study in 15 patients with 18 access sites. Weng MJ; Chen MC; Chi WC; Liu YC; Liang HL; Pan HB Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Apr; 34(2):319-30. PubMed ID: 20585780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]