176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21479967)
1. The frequency of vascular complications associated with the use of vascular closure devices varies by indication for cardiac catheterization.
Stegemann E; Hoffmann R; Marso S; Stegemann B; Marx N; Lauer T
Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 100(9):789-95. PubMed ID: 21479967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practices and complications of vascular closure devices and manual compression in patients undergoing elective transfemoral coronary procedures.
Smilowitz NR; Kirtane AJ; Guiry M; Gray WA; Dolcimascolo P; Querijero M; Echeverry C; Kalcheva N; Flores B; Singh VP; Rabbani L; Kodali S; Collins MB; Leon MB; Moses JW; Weisz G
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jul; 110(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 22482861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.
Cox T; Blair L; Huntington C; Lincourt A; Sing R; Heniford BT
Surg Technol Int; 2015 Nov; 27():32-44. PubMed ID: 26680377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial).
Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Women.
Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Hoppe K; Ott I; Hieber J; Morath T; Byrne RA; Kufner S; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Fusaro M; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e006074. PubMed ID: 30354782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.
Schulz-Schüpke S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Ibrahim T; Linhardt M; Haas K; Hoppe K; Böttiger C; Groha P; Bradaric C; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Ott I; Goedel J; Byrne RA; Schneider S; Burgdorf C; Morath T; Kufner S; Joner M; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Hengstenberg C; Pache J; Fusaro M; Massberg S; Mehilli J; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
JAMA; 2014 Nov; 312(19):1981-7. PubMed ID: 25399273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications with Angio-Seal™ vascular closure devices compared with manual compression after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Gregory D; Midodzi W; Pearce N
J Interv Cardiol; 2013 Dec; 26(6):630-8. PubMed ID: 24125119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial.
Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A;
EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vascular closure device failure: frequency and implications: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bangalore S; Arora N; Resnic FS
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Dec; 2(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 20031773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mynx Vascular Closure Device in Arterial Endovascular Procedures.
Scott MC; Spencer HJ; Ali AT; Moursi MM; Escobar GA; Lyons LC; Smeds MR
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 46():112-117. PubMed ID: 28546043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AbsorbaSeal™ Vascular Closure Device: A Novel Device for Hemostasis Following Interventional Peripheral Vascular Procedures.
Benham E; Deloose K; Callaert J; Bosiers M; Cox T; Lincourt A; Heniford BT
Surg Technol Int; 2017 Oct; 31():93-99. PubMed ID: 29020709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Access site complications are uncommon with vascular closure devices or manual compression after lower extremity revascularization.
Cheng TW; Farber A; King EG; Levin SR; Arinze N; Malas MB; Eslami MH; Garg K; Rybin D; Siracuse JJ
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 76(3):788-796.e2. PubMed ID: 35618194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the boomerang wire vascular access management system versus manual compression alone during percutaneous diagnostic and interventional cardiovascular procedures: The boomerang™ wire vascular access management trial II.
Goswami NJ; Smalling RG; Sinha S; Gammon RS; Ramaiah VG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jan; 87(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty.
Sanborn TA; Gibbs HH; Brinker JA; Knopf WD; Kosinski EJ; Roubin GS
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Nov; 22(5):1273-9. PubMed ID: 8227779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety and efficacy study of the wound care 360° SiteSeal® vascular closure device in percutaneous cardiac catheterization procedures.
Sharma S; Patel N; Jeevanantham V; Gupta K; Earnest MB
Vascular; 2021 Apr; 29(2):228-236. PubMed ID: 32718220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Propensity score analysis of vascular complications after diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention 1998-2003.
Applegate RJ; Sacrinty MT; Kutcher MA; Baki TT; Gandhi SK; Santos RM; Little WC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Apr; 67(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 16532497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral arterial puncture management after percutaneous coronary procedures: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction between manual compression and two different vascular closure devices.
Duffin DC; Muhlestein JB; Allisson SB; Horne BD; Fowles RE; Sorensen SG; Revenaugh JR; Bair TL; Lappe DL
J Invasive Cardiol; 2001 May; 13(5):354-62. PubMed ID: 11385148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the FemoSeal Vascular Closure Device With Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture - Post-hoc Analysis of a Large-Scale, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Mankerious N; Mayer K; Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Bott-Flügel L; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Schüpke S;
J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 30(7):235-239. PubMed ID: 29760286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a vascular closure device versus the radial approach to reduce access site complications in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients: The angio-seal versus the radial approach in acute coronary syndrome trial.
Andrade PB; Mattos LA; Rinaldi FS; Bienert IC; Barbosa RA; Labrunie A; Tebet M; Esteves V; Abizaid A; Sousa AR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):976-982. PubMed ID: 27514319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
