345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21480062)
1. Response to open peer commentaries on "assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials".
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21480062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the remedy: the case for contracts in clinical trials.
Edwards SJ
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):3-12. PubMed ID: 21480063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The subject-researcher relationship: in defense of contracting around default rules.
Meyer MN
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):27-30. PubMed ID: 21480072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The case against contract: participant and investigator duty in clinical trials.
De Ville K
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 21480066
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can contracts enhance participant autonomy in clinical trials?
Buccafurni D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):24-5. PubMed ID: 21480070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Through a glass darkly": researcher ethnocentrism and the demonization of research participants.
Lynch JA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):22-3. PubMed ID: 21480069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ulysses contracts for the doctor and for the patient.
Hansson MG; Hakama M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 May; 31(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20227524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The research subject as identified problem.
Wolpe PR
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 21480061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disclosing clinical trial results: publicity, significance and independence.
Liao SM; Sheehan M; Clarke S
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):W3-5. PubMed ID: 19998144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Committees for Ethics in Research involving human subjects.
Hossne WS; Vieira S; De Freitas CB
J Int Bioethique; 2008; 19(1-2):131-41, 200. PubMed ID: 18664006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Known versus unknown threats to internal validity: a response to Edwards.
Rice S; Trafimow D
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Apr; 11(4):20-1. PubMed ID: 21480068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients".
McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Am J Bioeth; 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7. PubMed ID: 21534136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
Reynolds D; Fleming DA
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomization can be risky.
Lott J
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
Brody H; Childress AM
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Equipoise trumps randomization.
Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The dirty little truth: we want them to understand, but not really..
Morreim H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 19180381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. To study, perchance to treat.
Trachtman H
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 19180382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
Smith ML
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Equipoise may be in the eye of the beholder.
Moyer A; Floyd AH
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 19180388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
