These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21480739)
1. A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM; Franco R; Trueblood JS Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):193-218. PubMed ID: 21480739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction. Wang Z; Busemeyer JR Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):689-710. PubMed ID: 24027203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology. Bruza PD; Wang Z; Busemeyer JR Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Jul; 19(7):383-93. PubMed ID: 26058709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A quantum probability account of order effects in inference. Trueblood JS; Busemeyer JR Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(8):1518-52. PubMed ID: 21951058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantum Cognition. Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():749-778. PubMed ID: 34546804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Typical versus atypical unpacking and superadditive probability judgment. Sloman S; Rottenstreich Y; Wisniewski E; Hadjichristidis C; Fox CR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 15099126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A quantum theory account of order effects and conjunction fallacies in political judgments. Yearsley JM; Trueblood JS Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1517-1525. PubMed ID: 28879495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Wang Z; Busemeyer JR; Atmanspacher H; Pothos EM Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):672-88. PubMed ID: 24027215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combining feature norms and text data with topic models. Steyvers M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):234-43. PubMed ID: 19948335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Open parallel cooperative and competitive decision processes: a potential provenance for quantum probability decision models. Fuss IG; Navarro DJ Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):818-43. PubMed ID: 24019237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):255-74. PubMed ID: 23673021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comments on quantum probability theory. Sloman S Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24482328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantum geometric model of similarity. Pothos EM; Busemeyer JR; Trueblood JS Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):679-96. PubMed ID: 23915087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concepts and their dynamics: a quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Aerts D; Gabora L; Sozzo S Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Oct; 5(4):737-72. PubMed ID: 24039114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment. Costello F; Watts P Psychol Rev; 2014 Jul; 121(3):463-80. PubMed ID: 25090427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of the Dirac formalism as a descriptive framework for cognition. Kaznatcheev A; Shultz TR Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Jun; 36(3):292-3. PubMed ID: 23673038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment. Thomas RP; Dougherty MR; Sprenger AM; Harbison JI Psychol Rev; 2008 Jan; 115(1):155-85. PubMed ID: 18211189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases. Cobos PL; Almaraz J; GarcĂa-Madruga JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On quantum models of the human mind. Wang H; Sun Y Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 24259276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]