133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21480756)
1. The influence of agenda-based and habitual processes on item selection during study.
Dunlosky J; Ariel R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):899-912. PubMed ID: 21480756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.
Ariel R; Dunlosky J; Bailey H
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Aug; 138(3):432-47. PubMed ID: 19653800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.
Wang F; Qin Q; Jiang Y
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():639. PubMed ID: 27199865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metacognitive control and spaced practice: clarifying what people do and why.
Toppino TC; Cohen MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1480-91. PubMed ID: 20822306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interference and the representation of order within associations.
Rehani M; Caplan JB
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jul; 64(7):1409-29. PubMed ID: 21598202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
Geraci L; Manzano I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognition influences item-method directed forgetting.
Foster NL; Sahakyan L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1309-24. PubMed ID: 22468801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metacognitive control: Shifting from habitual to agenda processes on item selection during study in elementary school children.
Li W; Ji H; Li F; Li P; Zhang Y; Li X
Br J Educ Psychol; 2016 Dec; 86(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 27739062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time.
Ariel R; Al-Harthy IS; Was CA; Dunlosky J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21735331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When do learners shift from habitual to agenda-based processes when selecting items for study?
Ariel R; Dunlosky J
Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):416-28. PubMed ID: 23135748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
Undorf M; Erdfelder E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning.
Metcalfe J; Kornell N
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2003 Dec; 132(4):530-42. PubMed ID: 14640846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Successful inhibition, unsuccessful retrieval: manipulating time and success during retrieval practice.
Storm BC; Nestojko JF
Memory; 2010 Feb; 18(2):99-114. PubMed ID: 19657962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Associations compete directly in memory.
Caplan JB; Rehani M; Andrews JC
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):955-78. PubMed ID: 24131316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred?
Toppino TC; Cohen MS; Davis ML; Moors AC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1352-8. PubMed ID: 19686028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is scanning in probed order recall articulatory?
Farrell S; Lelièvre A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1843-58. PubMed ID: 19180362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
