These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21480756)

  • 61. Congruity effects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm.
    Butler AC; Kang SH; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19857018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of individual thinking styles on item selection during study time allocation.
    Jia X; Li W; Cao L; Li P; Shi M; Wang J; Cao W; Li X
    Int J Psychol; 2018 Apr; 53(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 26987560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Self-regulated learning in younger and older adults: does aging affect metacognitive control?
    Price J; Hertzog C; Dunlosky J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 May; 17(3):329-59. PubMed ID: 19866382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Predictions of recall and study strategy decisions after diffuse brain injury.
    Kennedy MR; Carney E; Peters SM
    Brain Inj; 2003 Dec; 17(12):1043-64. PubMed ID: 14555364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Jang Y; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):851-8. PubMed ID: 25133515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):940-5. PubMed ID: 22774852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The spacing effect and metacognitive control.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):306-11. PubMed ID: 23895449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Associative independence revisited: competition between conflicting associations can be resolved or even reversed in one trial.
    Burton RL; Lek I; Caplan JB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):832-857. PubMed ID: 27112421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Factors that influence search termination decisions in free recall: an examination of response type and confidence.
    Unsworth N; Brewer GA; Spillers GJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 21621178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Learning test on expressive phonetic symbolism.
    Langenmayr A; Schmitz H
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):227-39. PubMed ID: 8873198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Children's agenda-based regulation: The effects of prior performance and reward on elementary school children's study choices.
    Lipowski S; Ariel R; Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Dec; 164():55-67. PubMed ID: 28779700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
    Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study.
    Dunlosky J; Thiede KW
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jul; 32(5):779-88. PubMed ID: 15552355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jan; 26(1):204-21. PubMed ID: 10682298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
    Cohen MS; Yan VX; Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1682-96. PubMed ID: 23565792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Toward an understanding of students' allocation of study time: why do they decide to mass or space their practice?
    Pyc MA; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):431-40. PubMed ID: 20516223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The recall of missing items.
    Murdock B; Smith D
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Apr; 33(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 16156174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Do Students Effectively Regulate Their Use of Self-Testing as a Function of Item Difficulty?
    Badali S; Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    Educ Psychol Rev; 2022; 34(3):1651-1677. PubMed ID: 35283609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1917-27. PubMed ID: 18265608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning?
    Metcalfe J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2002 Sep; 131(3):349-63. PubMed ID: 12214751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.