These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21480994)

  • 1. Variability in population abundance and the classification of extinction risk.
    Wilson HB; Kendall BE; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 21480994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantification of extinction risk: IUCN's system for classifying threatened species.
    Mace GM; Collar NJ; Gaston KJ; Hilton-Taylor C; Akçakaya HR; Leader-Williams N; Milner-Gulland EJ; Stuart SN
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1424-42. PubMed ID: 18847444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of uncertainty and variability on population declines and IUCN Red List classifications.
    Rueda-Cediel P; Anderson KE; Regan TJ; Regan HM
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Aug; 32(4):916-925. PubMed ID: 29356136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Chapter 4. Susceptibility of sharks, rays and chimaeras to global extinction.
    Field IC; Meekan MG; Buckworth RC; Bradshaw CJ
    Adv Mar Biol; 2009; 56():275-363. PubMed ID: 19895977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rates of movement of threatened bird species between IUCN red list categories and toward extinction.
    Brooke Mde L; Butchart SH; Garnett ST; Crowley GM; Mantilla-Beniers NB; Stattersfield AJ
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 18402584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analyzing variability and the rate of decline of migratory shorebirds in Moreton Bay, Australia.
    Wilson HB; Kendall BE; Fuller RA; Milton DA; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):758-66. PubMed ID: 21480993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A statistical approach to quasi-extinction forecasting.
    Holmes EE; Sabo JL; Viscido SV; Fagan WF
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Dec; 10(12):1182-98. PubMed ID: 17803676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-third of reef-building corals face elevated extinction risk from climate change and local impacts.
    Carpenter KE; Abrar M; Aeby G; Aronson RB; Banks S; Bruckner A; Chiriboga A; Cortés J; Delbeek JC; Devantier L; Edgar GJ; Edwards AJ; Fenner D; Guzmán HM; Hoeksema BW; Hodgson G; Johan O; Licuanan WY; Livingstone SR; Lovell ER; Moore JA; Obura DO; Ochavillo D; Polidoro BA; Precht WF; Quibilan MC; Reboton C; Richards ZT; Rogers AD; Sanciangco J; Sheppard A; Sheppard C; Smith J; Stuart S; Turak E; Veron JE; Wallace C; Weil E; Wood E
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):560-3. PubMed ID: 18653892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Threatened species and the potential loss of phylogenetic diversity: conservation scenarios based on estimated extinction probabilities and phylogenetic risk analysis.
    Faith DP
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Dec; 22(6):1461-70. PubMed ID: 18798854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of indicators of decline in abundance.
    Porszt EJ; Peterman RM; Dulvy NK; Cooper AB; Irvine JR
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):894-904. PubMed ID: 22741815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Food web structure and interaction strength pave the way for vulnerability to extinction.
    Karlsson P; Jonsson T; Jonsson A
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(1):77-92. PubMed ID: 17727894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the threat status of ecological communities.
    Nicholson E; Keith DA; Wilcove DS
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):259-74. PubMed ID: 19245533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Taxonomic and geographic patterns of decline for threatened and endangered species in the United States.
    Leidner AK; Neel MC
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):716-25. PubMed ID: 21672024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inferring national and regional declines of rare orchid species with probabilistic models.
    Duffy KJ; Kingston NE; Sayers BA; Roberts DL; Stout JC
    Conserv Biol; 2009 Feb; 23(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 18798858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The false classification of extinction risk in noisy environments.
    Connors BM; Cooper AB; Peterman RM; Dulvy NK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jul; 281(1787):. PubMed ID: 24898368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying and managing threatened invertebrates through assessment of coextinction risk.
    Moir ML; Vesk PA; Brennan KE; Keith DA; McCarthy MA; Hughes L
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):787-96. PubMed ID: 21453365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of recent environmental change on accuracy of inferences of extinction status.
    Clements CF; Collen B; Blackburn TM; Petchey OL
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Aug; 28(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 24962314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Range size and extinction risk in forest birds.
    Harris G; Pimm SL
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 18254861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conserving the abundance of nonthreatened species.
    Baker DJ; Garnett ST; O'Connor J; Ehmke G; Clarke RH; Woinarski JCZ; McGeoch MA
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):319-328. PubMed ID: 30047186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determining decision thresholds and evaluating indicators when conservation status is measured as a continuum.
    Connors BM; Cooper AB
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1626-35. PubMed ID: 25155174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.