These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21481463)

  • 1. Building a statewide home visiting program from 2 to 42 sites: a state agency's perspective.
    Foley-Schain K; Finholm V; Leventhal JM
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Apr; 35(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 21481463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: impact in preventing child abuse and neglect.
    Duggan A; McFarlane E; Fuddy L; Burrell L; Higman SM; Windham A; Sia C
    Child Abuse Negl; 2004 Jun; 28(6):597-622. PubMed ID: 15193851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: impact in reducing parental risk factors.
    Duggan A; Fuddy L; Burrell L; Higman SM; McFarlane E; Windham A; Sia C
    Child Abuse Negl; 2004 Jun; 28(6):623-43. PubMed ID: 15193852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse.
    Duggan A; Caldera D; Rodriguez K; Burrell L; Rohde C; Crowne SS
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Aug; 31(8):801-27. PubMed ID: 17822764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of Alaska's home visitation program for high-risk families on trends in abuse and neglect.
    Gessner BD
    Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Mar; 32(3):317-33. PubMed ID: 18377990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse in at-risk families of newborns: fathers' participation and outcomes.
    Duggan A; Fuddy L; McFarlane E; Burrell L; Windham A; Higman S; Sia C
    Child Maltreat; 2004 Feb; 9(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 14870994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evaluation of Healthy Families Arizona: a multisite home visitation program.
    Krysik J; LeCroy CW
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):109-27. PubMed ID: 17890196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hawaii's healthy start home visiting program: determinants and impact of rapid repeat birth.
    El-Kamary SS; Higman SM; Fuddy L; McFarlane E; Sia C; Duggan AK
    Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):e317-26. PubMed ID: 15342892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Healthy Families America: ruminations on implementing a home visitation program to prevent child maltreatment.
    Holton JK; Harding K
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):13-38. PubMed ID: 17890192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children.
    Sweet MA; Appelbaum MI
    Child Dev; 2004; 75(5):1435-56. PubMed ID: 15369524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Home visiting for the prevention of child maltreatment: lessons learned during the past 20 years.
    Donelan-McCall N; Eckenrode J; Olds DL
    Pediatr Clin North Am; 2009 Apr; 56(2):389-403. PubMed ID: 19358923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Healthy Families America state systems development: an emerging practice to ensure program growth and sustainability.
    Friedman L; Schreiber L
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):67-87. PubMed ID: 17890194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and implementation of a quality assurance infrastructure in a multisite home visitation program in Ohio and Kentucky.
    Ammerman RT; Putnam FW; Kopke JE; Gannon TA; Short JA; Van Ginkel JB; Clark MJ; Carrozza MA; Spector AR
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):89-107. PubMed ID: 17890195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The promise of primary prevention home visiting programs: a review of potential outcomes.
    Russell BS; Britner PA; Woolard JL
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):129-47. PubMed ID: 17890197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing home visiting programs to prevent child abuse: taking silver and bronze along with gold.
    Hahn RA; Mercy J; Bilukha O; Briss P
    Child Abuse Negl; 2005 Mar; 29(3):215-8; author reply 241-9. PubMed ID: 15820536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The promise and limitations of home visiting: implementing effective programs.
    Gomby DS
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Aug; 31(8):793-9. PubMed ID: 17822761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Healthy Families New York on the promotion of maternal parenting competencies and the prevention of harsh parenting.
    Rodriguez ML; Dumont K; Mitchell-Herzfeld SD; Walden NJ; Greene R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Oct; 34(10):711-23. PubMed ID: 20850872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economic evaluation of an intensive home visiting programme for vulnerable families: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a public health intervention.
    McIntosh E; Barlow J; Davis H; Stewart-Brown S
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):423-33. PubMed ID: 19497944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction: the challenge of integrating research into practice.
    Galano J
    J Prev Interv Community; 2007; 34(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17890191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of a statewide home visiting program on parenting and on child health and development.
    Caldera D; Burrell L; Rodriguez K; Crowne SS; Rohde C; Duggan A
    Child Abuse Negl; 2007 Aug; 31(8):829-52. PubMed ID: 17822765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.