These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21483270)

  • 21. Advances in wound photography and assessment methods.
    Ahn C; Salcido RS
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Feb; 21(2):85-93; quiz 94-5. PubMed ID: 18349736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validity and reliability of a new ankle dorsiflexion measurement device.
    Gatt A; Chockalingam N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2013 Aug; 37(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 23211471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Precision of a photogrammetric method to perform 3D wound measurements compared to standard 2D photographic techniques in the horse.
    Labens R; Blikslager A
    Equine Vet J; 2013 Jan; 45(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 22283145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional documentation of wound healing: first results of a new objective method for measurement.
    Körber A; Rietkötter J; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Oct; 4(10):848-54. PubMed ID: 17010174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using self-study modules to improve wound care documentation by the staff nurse.
    Koerber KL
    J Nurses Staff Dev; 2009; 25(4):E1-4. PubMed ID: 19657242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [3-dimensional documentation of wound-healing].
    Körber A; Grabbe S; Dissemond J
    Zentralbl Chir; 2006 Apr; 131 Suppl 1():S174-6. PubMed ID: 16575675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital imaging of wounds: are measurements reproducible among observers?
    Quan SY; Lazarus GS; Kohli AR; Kapoor R; Margolis DJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 18048869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating an iPad app in measuring wound dimension: a pilot study.
    Khong PCB; Yeo MSW; Goh CC
    J Wound Care; 2017 Dec; 26(12):752-760. PubMed ID: 29244972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a Novel Three-Dimensional Wound Measurement Device for Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Pena G; Kuang B; Szpak Z; Cowled P; Dawson J; Fitridge R
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2020 Nov; 9(11):623-631. PubMed ID: 33095125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Documentation of 7051 chronic wounds using a new computerized system within a network of wound care centers.
    Coerper S; Wicke C; Pfeffer F; Köveker G; Becker HD
    Arch Surg; 2004 Mar; 139(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 15006880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Verge Videometer wound measurement package.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 2000 Feb 24-Mar 8; 9(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 11033643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The importance of wound documentation and classification.
    Russell L
    Br J Nurs; 1999 Nov 11-24; 8(20):1342-3, 1346, 1348 passim. PubMed ID: 10887817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reliability of wound measuring techniques in an outpatient wound center.
    Bryant JL; Brooks TL; Schmidt B; Mostow EN
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Apr; 47(4):44-51. PubMed ID: 11890088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new smartphone-based method for wound area measurement.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Wojcicki JM
    Artif Organs; 2014 Apr; 38(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 24102380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
    Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
    Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photogrammetric documentation of regions of interest at autopsy--a pilot study.
    Slot L; Larsen PK; Lynnerup N
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):226-30. PubMed ID: 24117866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of forensic photo-documentation to a photogrammetric solution using the multi-camera system "Botscan".
    Michienzi R; Meier S; Ebert LC; Martinez RM; Sieberth T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():46-52. PubMed ID: 29715622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The documentation of wounds in an acute hospital setting.
    Hon J; Jones C
    Br J Nurs; 1996 Sep 26-Oct 9; 5(17):1040, 1042-5. PubMed ID: 8918763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.