These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
534 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21483464)
1. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Iglesias-Garcia J; Dominguez-Munoz JE; Abdulkader I; Larino-Noia J; Eugenyeva E; Lozano-Leon A; Forteza-Vila J Am J Gastroenterol; 2011 Sep; 106(9):1705-10. PubMed ID: 21483464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles. Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound imaging and the number of needle passages are significant factors predicting high yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses without an on-site cytopathologist. Jeong SH; Yoon HH; Kim EJ; Kim YJ; Kim YS; Cho JH Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jan; 96(2):e5782. PubMed ID: 28079803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes and solid masses: factors influencing the cellularity and adequacy of the aspirate. Wee E; Lakhtakia S; Gupta R; Sekaran A; Kalapala R; Monga A; Arjunan S; Reddy DN J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Jul; 46(6):487-93. PubMed ID: 22688144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Yoshinaga S; Suzuki H; Oda I; Saito Y Dig Endosc; 2011 May; 23 Suppl 1():29-33. PubMed ID: 21535197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological diagnosis by EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic solid masses without on-site cytopathologist: a single-center experience. Itoi T; Tsuchiya T; Itokawa F; Sofuni A; Kurihara T; Tsuji S; Ikeuchi N Dig Endosc; 2011 May; 23 Suppl 1():34-8. PubMed ID: 21535198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings. Tadic M; Kujundzic M; Stoos-Veic T; Kaic G; Vukelic-Markovic M Dig Dis; 2008; 26(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19188731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship of pancreatic mass size and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Siddiqui AA; Brown LJ; Hong SK; Draganova-Tacheva RA; Korenblit J; Loren DE; Kowalski TE; Solomides C Dig Dis Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(11):3370-5. PubMed ID: 21688127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing Number of Passes Beyond 4 Does Not Increase Sensitivity of Detection of Pancreatic Malignancy by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration. Mohamadnejad M; Mullady D; Early DS; Collins B; Marshall C; Sams S; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Nawaz S; Ulusarac O; Hollander T; Wilson RH; Simon VC; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Brauer BC; Gaddam S; Azar RR; Komanduri S; Shah R; Das A; Edmundowicz S; Muthusamy VR; Rastogi A; Wani S Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):1071-1078.e2. PubMed ID: 28025154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Yusuf TE; Ho S; Pavey DA; Michael H; Gress FG Endoscopy; 2009 May; 41(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 19418399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Storch I; Jorda M; Thurer R; Raez L; Rocha-Lima C; Vernon S; Ribeiro A Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Oct; 64(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 16996340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid on-site evaluation of EUS-FNA by cytopathologist: an experience of a tertiary hospital. Ecka RS; Sharma M Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1075-80. PubMed ID: 24166808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Suzuki R; Irisawa A; Bhutani MS; Hikichi T; Takagi T; Sato A; Sato M; Ikeda T; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Tasaki K; Obara K; Ohira H Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):452-6. PubMed ID: 23078439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration in chronic pancreatitis: differential diagnosis between pseudotumoral masses and pancreatic cancer. Ardengh JC; Lopes CV; Campos AD; Pereira de Lima LF; Venco F; Módena JL JOP; 2007 Jul; 8(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 17625292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does cytotechnician training influence the accuracy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses? Petrone MC; Arcidiacono PG; Carrara S; Mezzi G; Doglioni C; Testoni PA Dig Liver Dis; 2012 Apr; 44(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 22226546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: A prospective randomized trial. Sugimoto M; Takagi T; Hikichi T; Suzuki R; Watanabe K; Nakamura J; Kikuchi H; Konno N; Waragai Y; Watanabe H; Obara K; Ohira H Pancreatology; 2015; 15(5):538-541. PubMed ID: 26145837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions. Mehmood S; Jahan A; Loya A; Yusuf MA Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Apr; 43(4):278-86. PubMed ID: 25088987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses. Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]