BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21484393)

  • 1. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
    Hughes CM; Haddad JM; Franz EA; Zelaznik HN; Ryu JH
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):219-29. PubMed ID: 21484393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P; Schütz C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jun; 219(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 22562588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
    Hughes CM; Franz EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 188(4):541-50. PubMed ID: 18443769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 215(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 21938544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
    Janssen L; Beuting M; Meulenbroek R; Steenbergen B
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(1):61-73. PubMed ID: 18751972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Object and Task Properties on Bimanual Transport.
    Nakamura YC; O'Sullivan CA; Pollard NS
    J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(3):245-258. PubMed ID: 29741471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The destination defines the journey: an examination of the kinematics of hand-to-mouth movements.
    Flindall JW; Gonzalez CL
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 27512020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of unimanual and bimanual multiphased prehensile movements.
    Mason AH
    J Mot Behav; 2007 Jul; 39(4):291-305. PubMed ID: 17664171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different coupling for the reach and grasp components in bimanual prehension movements.
    Dohle C; Ostermann G; Hefter H; Freund HJ
    Neuroreport; 2000 Nov; 11(17):3787-91. PubMed ID: 11117492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The coordination patterns observed when two hands reach-to-grasp separate objects.
    Bingham GP; Hughes K; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(3):283-93. PubMed ID: 17763844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left visual field preference for a bimanual grasping task with ecologically valid object sizes.
    Le A; Niemeier M
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 23857170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anticipating different grips reduces bimanual end-state comfort: A tradeoff between goal-related and means-related planning processes.
    Seegelke C; Weigelt M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190586. PubMed ID: 29309417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common organization for unimanual and bimanual reach-to-grasp tasks.
    Tresilian JR; Stelmach GE
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Jun; 115(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 9224856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symmetry and synchrony of bimanual movements are not predicated on interlimb control coupling.
    Yuk J; Kitchen NM; Przybyla A; Scheidt RA; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2024 Jun; 131(6):982-996. PubMed ID: 38629153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
    van der Wel RP; Rosenbaum DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Sep; 205(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 20658129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Reissig P
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Jun; 87():22-9. PubMed ID: 24650762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.
    Blinch J; Flindall JW; Smaga Ł; Jung K; Gonzalez CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3297-3311. PubMed ID: 31664489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.
    Hughes CM; Reissig P; Seegelke C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 21663882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.