200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21484429)
1. Histologic grading of urothelial papillary neoplasms: impact of combined grading (two-numbered grading system) on reproducibility.
Tuna B; Yörükoglu K; Düzcan E; Sen S; Nese N; Sarsık B; Akder A; Sayhan S; Mungan U; Kirkali Z
Virchows Arch; 2011 Jun; 458(6):659-64. PubMed ID: 21484429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasia (NIPUN): Renaming cancer.
Jones TD; Cheng L
Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):286-290. PubMed ID: 35550107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Expression of MUC1 (Ma695) in noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasm according to the 2004 World Health Organization classification of the noninvasive urothelial neoplasm. An immunologic tool for the pathologist?
Garbar C; Mascaux C
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2011 Oct; 33(5):277-82. PubMed ID: 22611755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of MUC1 and P53 expressions in noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms of bladder, their relationship with tumor grade and role in the differential diagnosis.
Kaymaz E; Ozer E; Unverdi H; Hucumenoglu S
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2017; 60(4):510-514. PubMed ID: 29323063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive papillary urothelial neoplasms: the 2004 WHO/ISUP classification system.
Miyamoto H; Miller JS; Fajardo DA; Lee TK; Netto GJ; Epstein JI
Pathol Int; 2010 Jan; 60(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20055945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reappraisal of the papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP).
Jones TD; Cheng L
Histopathology; 2020 Oct; 77(4):525-535. PubMed ID: 32562556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of the reproducibility of the 2004 World Health Organization classification of urothelial neoplasms.
Sharma P; Kini H; Pai RR; Sahu KK; Kini J
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 25673594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytologic diagnosis of low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low-grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification.
Whisnant RE; Bastacky SI; Ohori NP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Apr; 28(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 12672093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.
Yorukoglu K; Tuna B; Dikicioglu E; Duzcan E; Isisag A; Sen S; Mungan U; Kirkali Z
Virchows Arch; 2003 Dec; 443(6):734-40. PubMed ID: 14534785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic grading of urothelial carcinoma: a reappraisal.
Cheng L; MacLennan GT; Lopez-Beltran A
Hum Pathol; 2012 Dec; 43(12):2097-108. PubMed ID: 22542126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urothelial neoplasms in patients 20 years or younger: a clinicopathological analysis using the world health organization 2004 bladder consensus classification.
Fine SW; Humphrey PA; Dehner LP; Amin MB; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2005 Nov; 174(5):1976-80. PubMed ID: 16217372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential: evolving terminology and concepts.
Jones TD; Cheng L
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):1995-2003. PubMed ID: 16697785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survivin as a useful adjunct marker for the grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma.
Chen YB; Tu JJ; Kao J; Zhou XK; Chen YT
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Feb; 132(2):224-31. PubMed ID: 18251581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 1998 WHO/ISUP and 1973 WHO classifications for interobserver variability in grading of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the bladder. Pathological evaluation of 258 cases.
Gonul II; Poyraz A; Unsal C; Acar C; Alkibay T
Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):338-44. PubMed ID: 17495493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential: reliability of diagnosis and outcome.
Campbell PA; Conrad RJ; Campbell CM; Nicol DL; MacTaggart P
BJU Int; 2004 Jun; 93(9):1228-31. PubMed ID: 15180612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Reid MD; Osunkoya AO; Siddiqui MT; Looney SW
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(9):882-91. PubMed ID: 23119105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic grading of noninvasive papillary urothelial tumors: validation of the 1998 WHO/ISUP system by immunophenotyping and follow-up.
Yin H; Leong AS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 May; 121(5):679-87. PubMed ID: 15151208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic algorithm for papillary urothelial tumors in the urinary bladder.
Shim JW; Cho KS; Choi YD; Park YW; Lee DW; Han WS; Shim SI; Kim HJ; Cho NH
Virchows Arch; 2008 Apr; 452(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 18311491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 1973 WHO Classification is more suitable than the 2004 WHO Classification for predicting prognosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Chen Z; Ding W; Xu K; Tan J; Sun C; Gou Y; Tong S; Xia G; Fang Z; Ding Q
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47199. PubMed ID: 23082147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of WHO 1973, WHO/ISUP 1998, WHO 1999 grade and combined scoring systems in evaluation of bladder carcinoma.
Bircan S; Candir O; Serel TA
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 15539837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
