These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21484840)

  • 1. Quantum mechanical binding free energy calculation for phosphopeptide inhibitors of the Lck SH2 domain.
    Anisimov VM; Cavasotto CN
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2254-63. PubMed ID: 21484840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions.
    Mishra SK; Koča J
    J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hydration free energies using semiempirical quantum mechanical Hamiltonians and a continuum solvent model with multiple atomic-type parameters.
    Anisimov VM; Cavasotto CN
    J Phys Chem B; 2011 Jun; 115(24):7896-905. PubMed ID: 21585215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing end-point methods for absolute binding free energy calculation using the Boltzmann-quasiharmonic model.
    Wickstrom L; Gallicchio E; Chen L; Kurtzman T; Deng N
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Mar; 24(10):6037-6052. PubMed ID: 35212338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A quantum mechanical study on phosphotyrosyl peptide binding to the SH2 domain of p56lck tyrosine kinase with insights into the biochemistry of intracellular signal transduction events.
    Pichierri F
    Biophys Chem; 2004 May; 109(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 15110947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protein/ligand binding free energies calculated with quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics.
    Gräter F; Schwarzl SM; Dejaegere A; Fischer S; Smith JC
    J Phys Chem B; 2005 May; 109(20):10474-83. PubMed ID: 16852269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of ligand-binding affinities supported by quantum mechanical methods.
    Söderhjelm P; Kongsted J; Genheden S; Ryde U
    Interdiscip Sci; 2010 Mar; 2(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 20640794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
    Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance assessment of semiempirical molecular orbital methods in describing halogen bonding: quantum mechanical and quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical-molecular dynamics study.
    Ibrahim MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2549-59. PubMed ID: 21942911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of linear-scaling semiempirical methods and combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical methods for enzymic reactions. II. An energy decomposition analysis.
    Titmuss SJ; Cummins PL; Rendell AP; Bliznyuk AA; Gready JE
    J Comput Chem; 2002 Nov; 23(14):1314-22. PubMed ID: 12214314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of trypsin specificity based on QM/MM molecular dynamics simulation and QM/MM GBSA calculation.
    Chen J; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen K; Zhu W
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2015; 33(12):2606-18. PubMed ID: 25562613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fragment quantum mechanical calculation of proteins and its applications.
    He X; Zhu T; Wang X; Liu J; Zhang JZ
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Sep; 47(9):2748-57. PubMed ID: 24851673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
    Wang J; Hou T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragment-based quantum mechanical calculation of protein-protein binding affinities.
    Wang Y; Liu J; Li J; He X
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Aug; 39(21):1617-1628. PubMed ID: 29707784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ligand-Binding Affinity Estimates Supported by Quantum-Mechanical Methods.
    Ryde U; Söderhjelm P
    Chem Rev; 2016 May; 116(9):5520-66. PubMed ID: 27077817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Crystal Structures and Thermodynamic Analysis Reveal Distinct Mechanisms of CD28 Phosphopeptide Binding to the Src Homology 2 (SH2) Domains of Three Adaptor Proteins.
    Inaba S; Numoto N; Ogawa S; Morii H; Ikura T; Abe R; Ito N; Oda M
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Jan; 292(3):1052-1060. PubMed ID: 27927989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient Approximation of Ligand Rotational and Translational Entropy Changes upon Binding for Use in MM-PBSA Calculations.
    Ben-Shalom IY; Pfeiffer-Marek S; Baringhaus KH; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Feb; 57(2):170-189. PubMed ID: 27996253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Combined QM/MM Poisson-Boltzmann Approach.
    Hayik SA; Liao N; Merz KM
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2008 Aug; 4(8):1200-7. PubMed ID: 26631696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining ab initio quantum mechanics with a dipole-field model to describe acid dissociation reactions in water: first-principles free energy and entropy calculations.
    Maurer P; Iftimie R
    J Chem Phys; 2010 Feb; 132(7):074112. PubMed ID: 20170220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B.
    Ciancetta A; Genheden S; Ryde U
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Aug; 25(8):729-42. PubMed ID: 21701919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.