These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21484858)

  • 1. The weighted optimal common shape technique improves identification of the hip joint center of rotation in vivo.
    Heller MO; Kratzenstein S; Ehrig RM; Wassilew G; Duda GN; Taylor WR
    J Orthop Res; 2011 Oct; 29(10):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21484858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The SCoRE residual: a quality index to assess the accuracy of joint estimations.
    Ehrig RM; Heller MO; Kratzenstein S; Duda GN; Trepczynski A; Taylor WR
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1400-4. PubMed ID: 21334628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effective marker placement for functional identification of the centre of rotation at the hip.
    Kratzenstein S; Kornaropoulos EI; Ehrig RM; Heller MO; Pöpplau BM; Taylor WR
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jul; 36(3):482-6. PubMed ID: 22672896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints.
    Ehrig RM; Taylor WR; Duda GN; Heller MO
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(15):2798-809. PubMed ID: 16293257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hip joint centre location: an ex vivo study.
    Cereatti A; Donati M; Camomilla V; Margheritini F; Cappozzo A
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(7):818-23. PubMed ID: 19268947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of thigh cluster configuration on the estimation of hip axial rotation.
    Schache AG; Baker R; Lamoreux LW
    Gait Posture; 2008 Jan; 27(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 17317186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A hip joint kinematics driven model for the generation of realistic thigh soft tissue artefacts.
    Camomilla V; Cereatti A; Chèze L; Cappozzo A
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(3):625-30. PubMed ID: 23116764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of heterotopic ossification on functional status of hip joint following total hip arthroplasty.
    Pohl F; Seufert J; Tauscher A; Lehmann H; Springorum HW; Flentje M; Koelbl O
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Aug; 181(8):529-33. PubMed ID: 16044221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination?
    Schwarz ML; Pott PP; Beck A; Heute S; Scharf HP
    Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 16199382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A framework for the functional identification of joint centers using markerless motion capture, validation for the hip joint.
    Corazza S; Mündermann L; Andriacchi T
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3510-5. PubMed ID: 17697684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of joint constraints on lower limb kinematics estimation from skin markers using global optimization.
    Duprey S; Cheze L; Dumas R
    J Biomech; 2010 Oct; 43(14):2858-62. PubMed ID: 20701914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of four functional methods to determine centers and axes of rotations.
    MacWilliams BA
    Gait Posture; 2008 Nov; 28(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 18586496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomic hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty as measured by a navigation system.
    Miki H; Yamanashi W; Nishii T; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Sugano N
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Oct; 22(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 17920464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty outcomes at early and intermediate follow-up.
    O'Brien S; Bennett D; Doran E; Beverland DE
    Orthopedics; 2009 Mar; 32(3):168. PubMed ID: 19309063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study.
    Incavo SJ; Thompson MT; Gold JE; Patel RV; Icenogle KD; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 20378308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Two-stage reimplantation using spacers--the method of choice in treatment of hip joint prosthesis-related infections. Comparison with methods used from 1979 to 1998].
    Jahoda D; Sosna A; Landor I; Vavrík P; Pokorný D; Hudec T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003; 70(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 12764947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty.
    Beaulieu ML; Lamontagne M; Beaulé PE
    Gait Posture; 2010 Jun; 32(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 20541940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Minimally invasive total hip replacement--one-year results].
    Stehlík J; Musil D; Held M; Stárek M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18760081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An optimized protocol for hip joint centre determination using the functional method.
    Camomilla V; Cereatti A; Vannozzi G; Cappozzo A
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):1096-106. PubMed ID: 16549099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.