283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21484905)
1. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Elastography of cervix to predict delay from induction to delivery].
Sonnier L; Bouhanna P; Arnou C; Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Dec; 42(12):827-31. PubMed ID: 25458805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography.
Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin.
Gultekin S; Gultekin IB; Icer B; Yilmaz E; Alkan A; Kucukozkan T
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(23):2795-2799. PubMed ID: 27868465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of the predictive value of digital examination (Bishop's score) and ultrasound evaluation for labor induction success].
Sieroszewski P; Banach R
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Feb; 81(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 20232707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.
Hwang HS; Sohn IS; Kwon HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jun; 32(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 23716514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Elastography assessment of the cervix during cervical maturation].
Kaouther D; Olivier A
Tunis Med; 2014 Jul; 92(7):448-51. PubMed ID: 25775282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonoelastography as method for preliminary evaluation of uterine cervix to predict success of induction of labor.
Muscatello A; Di Nicola M; Accurti V; Mastrocola N; Franchi V; Colagrande I; Patacchiola F; Carta G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2014; 35(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 24247111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.
Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Schmitz R
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Feb; 36(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24557633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.
Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z; Preis K
Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 25011217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial.
Park KH; Kim SN; Lee SY; Jeong EH; Jung HJ; Oh KJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21484904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elastography for predicting preterm delivery in patients with short cervical length at 18-22 weeks of gestation: a prospective observational study.
Woźniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Wrona W; Paszkowski T
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Jun; 86(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 26255452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can Transvaginal Cervical Elastography predict the success of induction of labor with oxytocin?
Halilzade I; Halilzade Mİ; Sert ÜY; Alkan M; Keskin HL
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2023 Aug; 227(4):277-280. PubMed ID: 37279798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In Vivo Evaluation of Cervical Stiffness Evolution during Induced Ripening Using Shear Wave Elastography, Histology and 2 Photon Excitation Microscopy: Insight from an Animal Model.
Peralta L; Mourier E; Richard C; Charpigny G; Larcher T; Aït-Belkacem D; Balla NK; Brasselet S; Tanter M; Muller M; Chavatte-Palmer P
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133377. PubMed ID: 26317774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.
Molina FS; Gómez LF; Florido J; Padilla MC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22173854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix.
Thomsen CR; Jensen MSS; Leonhard AK; Mortensen TØ; Bor P; Sandager P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Feb; 101(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 35049047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
