These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21485052)

  • 1. ["An Italian Court recognizes the occupational origin of a trigeminal neuroma in a mobile telephone user: a case-study of the complex relationships between science and laws"].
    Lagorio S; Vecchia P
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 21485052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Not Available].
    Levis A; Grasso G; Palmisano S; Consigliere F; Gennaro V
    Med Lav; 2012; 103(4):309-13; author reply 313. PubMed ID: 22880492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of scientific evidence in law, adjudication and policy: when occupational health takes the witness chair.
    Guidotti TL
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 17017343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [For the first time an Italian Court recognizes the association between mobile phones and a head cancer].
    Levis AG
    Epidemiol Prev; 2010; 34(1-2):2. PubMed ID: 20595722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Jurisprudence on occupational radiofrequency diseases].
    Polichetti A
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2020 Dec; 42(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 33600662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiology in the courtroom: an evidence-based paradigm for the determination of causation in compensation environments.
    Sinclair DC
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 52(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 20357683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The war against junk science: the use of expert panels in complex medical-legal scientific litigation.
    Price JM; Rosenberg ES
    Biomaterials; 1998 Aug; 19(16):1425-32. PubMed ID: 9794513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
    Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
    Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fighting trafficking of falsified and substandard medicinal products in Russia.
    Fayzrakhmanov NF
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S37-40. PubMed ID: 26639702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychological evidence at the dawn of the law's scientific age.
    Faigman DL; Monahan J
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2005; 56():631-59. PubMed ID: 15709949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
    Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cell Phones and Risk of brain and acoustic nerve tumours: the French INTERPHONE case-control study].
    Hours M; Bernard M; Montestrucq L; Arslan M; Bergeret A; Deltour I; Cardis E
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2007 Oct; 55(5):321-32. PubMed ID: 17851009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
    Melnick RL
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature].
    Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM
    Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.