These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21485088)

  • 1. [Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews correlated to traditional Chinese medicine published in China].
    Hu D; Kang DY; Wu YX
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 31(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21485088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Assessment of reliability and validity of assessment of multiple systematic reviews in Chinese systematic reviews on stomatology].
    Su N; Lü J; Li C; Chen L; Shi Z
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 31(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23484302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
    Liu JP; Xia Y
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
    Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of network meta-analyses in Chinese medicine.
    Yang F; Wang H; Zou J; Li X; Jin X; Cao Y; Tian J; Ge L; Lee MS; Zhang J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(47):e13052. PubMed ID: 30461607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship Between Periodontal and Systemic Diseases.
    Natto ZS; Hameedaldain A
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 19(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 31326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Traditional Chinese medicine for myocardial infarction: an overview.
    Dong-mei X; Jun-hua Z; Li-yuan K; Ming-jun Z; Hong-cai S
    Int J Clin Pract; 2013 Dec; 67(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24246206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews.
    Xinke Z; Yingdong L; Mingxia F; Kai L; Kaibing C; Yuqing L; Shaobo S; Peng S; Bin L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):180. PubMed ID: 27760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Guo J; Qi G; Li H; Peng J; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20185. PubMed ID: 21633698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis: systematic reviews based on PRIO-harms].
    Shen ZF; Wu HH; Zhu L; Zhou Q; Shen H
    Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 45(3):674-682. PubMed ID: 32237528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.
    Junhua Z; Hongcai S; Xiumei G; Boli Z; Yaozu X; Hongbo C; Ming R
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):797-805. PubMed ID: 17983335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Methodological and reporting quality assessment for Chinese systematic reviews and meta analysis in oral medicine].
    Yang SL; Ying K; Wang F; Wang L; Ren XY; Yang QF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Aug; 24(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 26383582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
    Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
    Shea BJ; Hamel C; Wells GA; Bouter LM; Kristjansson E; Grimshaw J; Henry DA; Boers M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19230606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.