182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21485088)
1. [Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews correlated to traditional Chinese medicine published in China].
Hu D; Kang DY; Wu YX
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 31(3):402-6. PubMed ID: 21485088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Assessment of reliability and validity of assessment of multiple systematic reviews in Chinese systematic reviews on stomatology].
Su N; Lü J; Li C; Chen L; Shi Z
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 31(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23484302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Quality appraisal of systematic reviews or meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine published in Chinese journals].
Liu JP; Xia Y
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2007 Apr; 27(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 17526167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of network meta-analyses in Chinese medicine.
Yang F; Wang H; Zou J; Li X; Jin X; Cao Y; Tian J; Ge L; Lee MS; Zhang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(47):e13052. PubMed ID: 30461607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship Between Periodontal and Systemic Diseases.
Natto ZS; Hameedaldain A
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 19(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 31326045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Traditional Chinese medicine for myocardial infarction: an overview.
Dong-mei X; Jun-hua Z; Li-yuan K; Ming-jun Z; Hong-cai S
Int J Clin Pract; 2013 Dec; 67(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24246206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews.
Xinke Z; Yingdong L; Mingxia F; Kai L; Kaibing C; Yuqing L; Shaobo S; Peng S; Bin L
Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):180. PubMed ID: 27760557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals.
Ma B; Guo J; Qi G; Li H; Peng J; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Yang K
PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20185. PubMed ID: 21633698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Traditional Chinese medicine for ulcerative colitis: systematic reviews based on PRIO-harms].
Shen ZF; Wu HH; Zhu L; Zhou Q; Shen H
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi; 2020 Feb; 45(3):674-682. PubMed ID: 32237528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methodology and reporting quality of systematic review/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine.
Junhua Z; Hongcai S; Xiumei G; Boli Z; Yaozu X; Hongbo C; Ming R
J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):797-805. PubMed ID: 17983335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Methodological and reporting quality assessment for Chinese systematic reviews and meta analysis in oral medicine].
Yang SL; Ying K; Wang F; Wang L; Ren XY; Yang QF
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Aug; 24(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 26383582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
Shea BJ; Hamel C; Wells GA; Bouter LM; Kristjansson E; Grimshaw J; Henry DA; Boers M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19230606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
