These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2148575)

  • 1. The revelation effect: when disguising test items induces recognition.
    Watkins MJ; Peynircioglu ZF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1012-20. PubMed ID: 2148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does familiarity change in the revelation effect?
    Verde MF; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 14516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition through incremental fragment cuing with primed items.
    Peynircioğlu ZF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):569-72. PubMed ID: 2959740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Picture recognition without picture identification: a method for assessing the role of perceptual information in familiarity-based picture recognition.
    Langley MM; Cleary AM; Kostic BN; Woods JA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 17434434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recognition and frequency judgments in young and elderly adults.
    Freund JS; Witte KL
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 3717457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.
    Bäuml KH; Aslan A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 16478338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
    Goschke T; Bolte A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition failure of categorised words: further evidence of exceptions.
    Gardiner JM; Mäntylä T; Nilsson LG
    Memory; 1995 Mar; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 8556534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently.
    Grainger J; Tydgat I; Isselé J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):673-88. PubMed ID: 20515197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: evidence for metacognitive illusions.
    Rhodes MG; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Nov; 137(4):615-25. PubMed ID: 18999356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Context effects on remembering and knowing: the expectancy heuristic.
    McCabe DP; Balota DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):536-49. PubMed ID: 17470004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Osborn K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):564-71. PubMed ID: 19271869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term repetition priming of briefly identified objects.
    Breuer AT; Masson ME; Cohen AL; Lindsay DS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 19271861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The revelation that the revelation effect is not due to revelation.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Mar; 24(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 9530844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Endogenous versus exogenous attentional cuing effects on memory.
    Hauer BJ; MacLeod CM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):305-20. PubMed ID: 16458848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the generality of the revelation effect.
    Westerman DL; Greene RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Sep; 22(5):1147-53. PubMed ID: 8805819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recollective experience in the revelation effect: separating the contributions of recollection and familiarity.
    LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 May; 23(3):324-34. PubMed ID: 7791601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.