These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2148593)

  • 1. Visual attention modulates signal detectability.
    Hawkins HL; Hillyard SA; Luck SJ; Mouloua M; Downing CJ; Woodward DP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):802-11. PubMed ID: 2148593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Luminance-increment detection: capacity-limited or not?
    Müller HJ; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 1826306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial distribution of visual attention: perceptual sensitivity and response latency.
    Handy TC; Kingstone A; Mangun GR
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 May; 58(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 8934691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.
    Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 1826325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.
    Luck SJ; Hillyard SA; Mouloua M; Woldorff MG; Clark VP; Hawkins HL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Aug; 20(4):887-904. PubMed ID: 8083642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional dynamics of masked detection.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Feb; 30(1):119-36. PubMed ID: 14769072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chronometric analysis of apparent spotlight failure in endogenous visual orienting.
    Klein R; Hansen E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):790-801. PubMed ID: 2148592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mask-dependent attentional cuing effects in visual signal detection: the psychometric function for contrast.
    Smith PL; Wolfgang BJ; Sinclair AJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Aug; 66(6):1056-75. PubMed ID: 15675651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional mechanisms in simple visual detection: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.
    Liu CC; Wolfgang BJ; Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1329-45. PubMed ID: 19803640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.
    Palmer J; Ames CT; Lindsey DT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Feb; 19(1):108-30. PubMed ID: 8440980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction?
    Luck SJ; Hillyard SA; Mouloua M; Hawkins HL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Jun; 22(3):725-37. PubMed ID: 8666960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention.
    Olson IR; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1299-313. PubMed ID: 11550756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field.
    Chastain G
    Psychol Res; 1992; 54(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 1509025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.
    Cheal M; Lyon DR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):859-80. PubMed ID: 1775667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Top-down control over biased competition during covert spatial orienting.
    Awh E; Matsukura M; Serences JT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 12669747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention and luminance detection: effects of cues, masks, and pedestals.
    Smith PL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1401-20. PubMed ID: 10946722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What we remember affects how we see: spatial working memory steers saccade programming.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):308-21. PubMed ID: 23093301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detectability as a function of spatial location: effects of selective attention.
    Yund EW; Efron R; Nichols DR
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Jan; 12(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 2297434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.