These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2148595)

  • 1. Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):826-42. PubMed ID: 2148595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are spatial responses to visuospatial stimuli and spoken responses to auditory letters ideomotor-compatible tasks? Examination of set-size effects on dual-task interference.
    Shin YK; Proctor RW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 18845280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice.
    Hazeltine E; Teague D; Ivry RB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):527-45. PubMed ID: 12075886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres.
    Pashler H; O'Brien S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 8473842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):795-810. PubMed ID: 15462621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect?
    Maquestiaux F; Hartley AA; Bertsch J
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Dec; 19(4):649-67. PubMed ID: 15584790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17563177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Miller J; Alderton M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):149-65. PubMed ID: 16478333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parallel response selection after callosotomy.
    Hazeltine E; Weinstein A; Ivry RB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):526-40. PubMed ID: 18004953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age.
    Maquestiaux F; Laguë-Beauvais M; Ruthruff E; Hartley A; Bherer L
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Mar; 25(1):177-92. PubMed ID: 20230138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aging and input processing in dual-task situations.
    Hein G; Schubert T
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):416-32. PubMed ID: 15382993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modality pairing effects and the response selection bottleneck.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 16151721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?
    Ruthruff E; Hazeltine E; Remington RW
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 16184395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Simon effect in vocal responses.
    Wühr P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Feb; 121(2):210-26. PubMed ID: 16321353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E; Remington RW
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Jun; 52(4):291-345. PubMed ID: 16581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.