These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21487764)

  • 1. Rapid diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by multiplex real-time PCR.
    Barbut F; Monot M; Rousseau A; Cavelot S; Simon T; Burghoffer B; Lalande V; Tankovic J; Petit JC; Dupuy B; Eckert C
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1279-85. PubMed ID: 21487764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multiplex, internally controlled real-time PCR assay for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and identification of hypervirulent strain 027/ST-1.
    Hoegh AM; Nielsen JB; Lester A; Friis-Møller A; Schønning K
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1073-9. PubMed ID: 21938539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.
    Carroll KC; Buchan BW; Tan S; Stamper PD; Riebe KM; Pancholi P; Kelly C; Rao A; Fader R; Cavagnolo R; Watson W; Goering RV; Trevino EA; Weissfeld AS; Ledeboer NA
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):4120-5. PubMed ID: 24088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A/B genes by multiplex real-time PCR for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection.
    Kim H; Jeong SH; Kim M; Lee Y; Lee K
    J Med Microbiol; 2012 Feb; 61(Pt 2):274-277. PubMed ID: 21959205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid Simultaneous Molecular Stool-Based Detection of Toxigenic Clostridioides difficile by Quantitative TaqMan Real-Time PCR Assay.
    Kouhsari E; Douraghi M; Barati M; Yaseri HF; Talebi M; Abbasian S; Moqarabzadeh V; Amirmozafari N
    Clin Lab; 2019 Apr; 65(4):. PubMed ID: 30969066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Clostridium difficile Epi assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection and typing of the NAP1 strain at a cancer hospital.
    Babady NE; Stiles J; Ruggiero P; Khosa P; Huang D; Shuptar S; Kamboj M; Kiehn TE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Dec; 48(12):4519-24. PubMed ID: 20943860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.
    Lalande V; Barrault L; Wadel S; Eckert C; Petit JC; Barbut F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jul; 49(7):2714-6. PubMed ID: 21525213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of real-time PCR techniques to cytotoxigenic culture methods for diagnosing Clostridium difficile infection.
    Knetsch CW; Bakker D; de Boer RF; Sanders I; Hofs S; Kooistra-Smid AM; Corver J; Eastwood K; Wilcox MH; Kuijper EJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jan; 49(1):227-31. PubMed ID: 20980562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perirectal swab surveillance for Clostridium difficile by use of selective broth preamplification and real-time PCR detection of tcdB.
    Curry SR; Schlackman JL; Hamilton TM; Henderson TK; Brown NT; Marsh JW; Shutt KA; Brooks MM; Pasculle AW; Muto CA; Harrison LH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Nov; 49(11):3788-93. PubMed ID: 21880961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile: real-time PCR detection of toxin genes in faecal samples is more sensitive compared to toxigenic culture.
    Jensen MB; Olsen KE; Nielsen XC; Hoegh AM; Dessau RB; Atlung T; Engberg J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2015 Apr; 34(4):727-36. PubMed ID: 25421216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff and Seegene Seeplex ACE PCR assays using toxigenic Clostridium difficile culture for direct detection of tcdB from stool specimens.
    Shin BM; Mun SJ; Yoo SJ; Kuak EY
    J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Nov; 50(11):3765-7. PubMed ID: 22952270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of strain type on detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of molecular diagnostic and enzyme immunoassay approaches.
    Tenover FC; Novak-Weekley S; Woods CW; Peterson LR; Davis T; Schreckenberger P; Fang FC; Dascal A; Gerding DN; Nomura JH; Goering RV; Akerlund T; Weissfeld AS; Baron EJ; Wong E; Marlowe EM; Whitmore J; Persing DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3719-24. PubMed ID: 20702676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a new automated homogeneous PCR assay, GenomEra C. difficile, for rapid detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens.
    Hirvonen JJ; Mentula S; Kaukoranta SS
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):2908-12. PubMed ID: 23804386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of a commercial multiplex real-time PCR to the cell cytotoxicity neutralization assay for diagnosis of clostridium difficile infections.
    Huang H; Weintraub A; Fang H; Nord CE
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 47(11):3729-31. PubMed ID: 19741082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clostridium difficile stool shedding in infants hospitalized in two neonatal intensive care units is lower than previous point prevalence estimates using molecular diagnostic methods.
    Hines AG; Freifeld A; Zhao X; Berry AA; Willett L; Iwen PC; Simonsen KA
    BMC Pediatr; 2018 Apr; 18(1):137. PubMed ID: 29653526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid stool-based diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by real-time PCR in a children's hospital.
    Luna RA; Boyanton BL; Mehta S; Courtney EM; Webb CR; Revell PA; Versalovic J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Mar; 49(3):851-7. PubMed ID: 21209161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Presumptive identification of Clostridium difficile strain 027/NAP1/BI on Cepheid Xpert: interpret with caution.
    Kok J; Wang Q; Thomas LC; Gilbert GL
    J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Oct; 49(10):3719-21. PubMed ID: 21849697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
    Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
    Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the Xpert Clostridium difficile assay for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
    Shin S; Kim M; Kim M; Lim H; Kim H; Lee K; Chong Y
    Ann Lab Med; 2012 Sep; 32(5):355-8. PubMed ID: 22950071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.