173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21487901)
1. A study of kinematic cues and anticipatory performance in tennis using computational manipulation and computer graphics.
Ida H; Fukuhara K; Kusubori S; Ishii M
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):781-90. PubMed ID: 21487901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative relation between server motion and receiver anticipation in tennis: implications of responses to computer-simulated motions.
Ida H; Fukuhara K; Sawada M; Ishii M
Perception; 2011; 40(10):1221-36. PubMed ID: 22308891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anticipatory judgements associated with vision of an opponent's end-effector: An approach by motion perturbation and spatial occlusion.
Ida H; Fukuhara K; Ishii M; Inoue T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1131-1140. PubMed ID: 29792565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower-limb coordination and shoulder joint mechanics in the tennis serve.
Reid M; Elliott B; Alderson J
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2008 Feb; 40(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 18202570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of local kinematic changes on anticipation judgments.
Cañal-Bruland R; van Ginneken WF; van der Meer BR; Williams AM
Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Jun; 30(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 21239078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contributions of upper limb rotations to racket velocity in table tennis backhands against topspin and backspin.
Iino Y; Mori T; Kojima T
J Sports Sci; 2008 Feb; 26(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 17934947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dynamical information underpinning anticipation skill.
Mark Williams A; Huys R; Cañal-Bruland R; Hagemann N
Hum Mov Sci; 2009 Jun; 28(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 19081648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kinetic chain of overarm throwing in terms of joint rotations revealed by induced acceleration analysis.
Hirashima M; Yamane K; Nakamura Y; Ohtsuki T
J Biomech; 2008 Sep; 41(13):2874-83. PubMed ID: 18678375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recognition of tennis serve performed by a digital player: comparison among polygon, shadow, and stick-figure models.
Ida H; Fukuhara K; Ishii M
PLoS One; 2012; 7(3):e33879. PubMed ID: 22439009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual response and information pick-up strategies within a family of sports.
Ida H; Fukuhara K; Ishii M; Inoue T
Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Feb; 32(1):106-20. PubMed ID: 23273424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kinematic Comparisons of the Shakehand and Penhold Grips in Table Tennis Forehand and Backhand Strokes when Returning Topspin and Backspin Balls.
Xia R; Dai B; Fu W; Gu N; Wu Y
J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Dec; 19(4):637-644. PubMed ID: 33239936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between Angular Velocities in Selected Joints and Velocity of Table Tennis Racket during Topspin Forehand and Backhand.
Bańkosz Z; Winiarski S
J Sports Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 17(2):330-338. PubMed ID: 29769835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of upper limb segment rotations in the development of spin in the tennis forehand.
Takahashi K; Elliott B; Noffal G
Aust J Sci Med Sport; 1996 Dec; 28(4):106-13. PubMed ID: 9040900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anticipation of tennis-shot direction from whole-body movement: the role of movement amplitude and dynamics.
Smeeton NJ; Huys R
Hum Mov Sci; 2011 Oct; 30(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 20817322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the high and low backspin backhand drives in tennis using different grips.
Elliott B; Christmass M
J Sports Sci; 1995 Apr; 13(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 7595982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kinematics and kinetics of the racket-arm during the soft-tennis smash under match conditions.
Ida H; Kusubori S; Ishii M
J Appl Biomech; 2005 Nov; 21(4):334-47. PubMed ID: 16498179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of anticipatory visual cues by highly skilled tennis players.
Shim J; Carlton LG; Chow JW; Chae WS
J Mot Behav; 2005 Mar; 37(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 15730949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Global information pickup underpins anticipation of tennis shot direction.
Huys R; Cañal-Bruland R; Hagemann N; Beek PJ; Smeeton NJ; Williams AM
J Mot Behav; 2009 Mar; 41(2):158-71. PubMed ID: 19201686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of kinematic characteristics of tennis strokes for anticipating stroke type and direction.
Shim J; Les Carlton G; Kwon YH
Res Q Exerc Sport; 2006 Sep; 77(3):326-39. PubMed ID: 17020077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head, eye and arm coordination in table tennis.
Rodrigues ST; Vickers JN; Williams AM
J Sports Sci; 2002 Mar; 20(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 11999475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
