These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488395)
1. [Remote management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an application of telemedicine]. Ganière V; Burri H Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Mar; 7(285):548-50, 552-3. PubMed ID: 21488395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study. Varma N Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Home monitoring remote control of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients in clinical practice: impact on medical management and health-care resource utilization. Ricci RP; Morichelli L; Santini M Europace; 2008 Feb; 10(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 18199570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potential role of remote monitoring for scheduled and unscheduled evaluations of patients with an implantable defibrillator. Heidbüchel H; Lioen P; Foulon S; Huybrechts W; Ector J; Willems R; Ector H Europace; 2008 Mar; 10(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18245771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Remote monitoring of automatic implantable cardiovascular devices (pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization)]. Guevara-Valdivia ME Arch Cardiol Mex; 2009; 79(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 19902671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database. Lazarus A Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S2-S12. PubMed ID: 17302706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of implantable pacemakers and cardioverter defibrillators in the magnetic field of a novel remote magnetic navigation system. Jilek C; Tzeis S; Reents T; Estner HL; Fichtner S; Ammar S; Wu J; Hessling G; Deisenhofer I; Kolb C J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1136-41. PubMed ID: 20522155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific. Lau CP; Zhang S Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i65-i68. PubMed ID: 23737235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: patients' inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey. Gramegna L; Tomasi C; Gasparini G; Scaboro G; Zanon F; Boaretto G; Tomei R; Tomasi L Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22080472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Technical and practical aspects of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients in Poland - preliminary results. Przybylski A; Zakrzewska-Koperska J; Maciag A; Derejko P; Orczykowski M; Szumowski L; Walczak F Kardiol Pol; 2009 May; 67(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19521935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial design of the clinical evaluation of remote notification to reduce time to clinical decision: the Clinical evaluation Of remote NotificatioN to rEduCe Time to clinical decision (CONNECT) study. Crossley G; Boyle A; Vitense H; Sherfesee L; Mead RH Am Heart J; 2008 Nov; 156(5):840-6. PubMed ID: 19061696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial. Varma N; Epstein AE; Irimpen A; Schweikert R; Love C; Circulation; 2010 Jul; 122(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 20625110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The concurrent implantation of a last-generation automatic defibrillator and a 2-chamber pacemaker]. Cesario AS; Palermo P; Baragli D; Amici E; Biancalana G; Gambelli G; Neri R G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):878-86. PubMed ID: 9773313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The utility of remote monitoring in the follow-up of patients with cardiac rhythm management devices]. Mäkelä T; Uusimaa P; Koivisto UM; Raatikainen P Duodecim; 2009; 125(19):2059-65. PubMed ID: 19938409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety of remote magnetic navigation in patients with pacemakers and implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Eitel C; Hindricks G; Sommer P; Wetzel U; Bollmann A; Gaspar T; Piorkowski C; Arya A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1130-5. PubMed ID: 20455985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current clinical evidence for remote patient management. Guédon-Moreau L; Mabo P; Kacet S Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i6-i10. PubMed ID: 23737234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable loop recorder. Drak-Hernández Y; Toquero-Ramos J; Fernández JM; Pérez-Pereira E; Castro-Urda V; Fernández-Lozano I Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2013 Dec; 66(12):943-8. PubMed ID: 24774107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of alert messages in the remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and pacemakers: an Italian single-region study. Folino AF; Chiusso F; Zanotto G; Vaccari D; Gasparini G; Megna A; Marras E; Mantovan R; Vaglio A; Boscolo G; Biancalana G; Leoni L; Iliceto S; Buja G Europace; 2011 Sep; 13(9):1281-91. PubMed ID: 21642369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]