273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488727)
1. Comparative evaluation of microleakage among three different glass ionomer types.
Abd El Halim S; Zaki D
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 21488727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage and marginal gap formation of glass ionomer resin restorations.
Salama FS; Riad MI; Abdel Megid FY
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1995; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 8634192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth.
Castro A; Feigal RE
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 11874054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of matrix use on microleakage in Class 5 glass-ionomer restorations.
Sparks JD; Hilton TJ; Davis RD; Reagan SE
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):192-5. PubMed ID: 1289866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of desiccation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials.
Bouschlicher MR; Vargas MA; Denehy GE
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):90-5. PubMed ID: 9002867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An in vitro comparison of marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted permanent molars.
Wadenya R; Mante FK
Pediatr Dent; 2007; 29(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 17867395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal microleakage of alternative restorative treatment and conventional glass ionomer restorations in extracted primary molars.
Wadenya RO; Yego C; Mante FK
J Dent Child (Chic); 2010; 77(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 20359427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage of resin-based liner materials and condensable composites using filled and unfilled adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Papathanasiou A; Perry R
Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 14677616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
