BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488728)

  • 1. Confocal laser microscopic analysis of biofilm on newer feldspar ceramic.
    Brentel AS; Kantorski KZ; Valandro LF; Fúcio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Bottino MA
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 21488728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polishing methods of an alumina-reinforced feldspar ceramic.
    Bottino MC; Valandro LF; Kantorski KZ; Bressiani JC; Bottino MA
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 17262140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SEM analysis of the in situ early bacterial colonization on two novel feldspathic ceramics submitted to different types of glazing.
    Pereira SM; Kantorski KZ; Brentel AS; Valandro LF; Bottino MA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 18264525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures.
    Sasahara RM; Ribeiro Fda C; Cesar PF; Yoshimura HN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):577-83. PubMed ID: 17024946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.
    Sarac D; Sarac YS; Yuzbasioglu E; Bal S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 16911889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of different surface treatments on stainability of ceramics.
    Motro PF; Kursoglu P; Kazazoglu E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):231-7. PubMed ID: 23031729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer.
    Tholt de Vasconcellos B; Miranda-Júnior WG; Prioli R; Thompson J; Oda M
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 16924984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of brushing with conventional versus whitening dentifrices on surface roughness and biofilm formation of dental ceramics.
    Azevedo SM; Kantorski KZ; Valandro LF; Bottino MA; Pavanelli CA
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(3):e123-30. PubMed ID: 22623466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphology and bacterial colonisation of tooth/ceramic restoration interface after different cement excess removal techniques.
    Anami LC; Pereira CA; Guerra E; Assunção e Souza RO; Jorge AO; Bottino MA
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):742-9. PubMed ID: 22617433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces.
    Aksoy G; Polat H; Polat M; Coskun G
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Dec; 53(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 17097279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Full-contour Y-TZP ceramic surface roughness effect on synthetic hydroxyapatite wear.
    Sabrah AH; Cook NB; Luangruangrong P; Hara AT; Bottino MC
    Dent Mater; 2013 Jun; 29(6):666-73. PubMed ID: 23566765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of six surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of a low-fusing and an ultra low-fusing feldspathic ceramic material.
    Dalkiz M; Sipahi C; Beydemir B
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 19141045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Manufacturing and Finishing Techniques of Feldspathic Ceramics on Surface Topography, Biofilm Formation, and Cell Viability for Human Gingival Fibroblasts.
    Contreras L; Dal Piva A; Ribeiro FC; Anami LC; Camargo S; Jorge A; Bottino MA
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 29856699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of four finishing systems on one ceramic surface.
    Martínez-Gomis J; Bizar J; Anglada JM; Samsó J; Peraire M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 12675460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing.
    Ward MT; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(3):106-10. PubMed ID: 7479187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
    Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.