260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488955)
1. Incentive structure of and private landowner participation in an endangered species conservation program.
Sorice MG; Haider W; Conner JR; Ditton RB
Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):587-96. PubMed ID: 21488955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.
Pasquini L; Cowling RM; Twyman C; Wainwright J
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.
Moon K; Cocklin C
Conserv Biol; 2011 Jun; 25(3):493-503. PubMed ID: 21309851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A case study of landholder attitudes and behaviour toward the conservation of renosterveld, a critically endangered vegetation type in Cape Floral Kingdom, South Africa.
Winter SJ; Prozesky H; Esler KJ
Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 40(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17530328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land.
Yasué M; Kirkpatrick JB; Davison A; Gilfedder L
Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):287-302. PubMed ID: 31359092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Landowner preferences for wetlands conservation programs in two Southern Ontario watersheds.
Trenholm R; Haider W; Lantz V; Knowler D; Haegeli P
J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 200():6-21. PubMed ID: 28549304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are incentive programs working? Landowner attitudes to ecological restoration of agricultural landscapes.
Jellinek S; Parris KM; Driscoll DA; Dwyer PD
J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():69-76. PubMed ID: 23685119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation.
Fitzsimons JA; Wescott G
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16904814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of private-land use, livestock management, and human tolerance on diversity, distribution, and abundance of large african mammals.
Kinnaird MF; O'brien TG
Conserv Biol; 2012 Dec; 26(6):1026-39. PubMed ID: 23082891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contributions of private landowners to the conservation of the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus).
Underwood VJ; Ober HK; Miller DL; Munn IA
Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 49(4):846-54. PubMed ID: 22371129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Traditional plant harvesting in contemporary fragmented and urban landscapes.
Wehi PM; Wehi WL
Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):594-604. PubMed ID: 19961510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of prescribed burn associations in the application of prescribed fires in rangeland ecosystems.
Toledo D; Kreuter UP; Sorice MG; Taylor CA
J Environ Manage; 2014 Jan; 132():323-8. PubMed ID: 24333743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
