These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488967)

  • 1. Implant image quality in dental radiographs recorded using a customized imaging guide or a standard film holder.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21488967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the RB-RB/LB-LB mnemonic rule for recording optimally projected intraoral images of dental implants: an in vitro study.
    Schropp L; Stavropoulos A; Spin-Neto R; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):298-304. PubMed ID: 22184473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of radiographic technique using a new customized film holder for dental implant assessment.
    Aparecida de Mattias Sartori I; da Silveira Junior CD; Fontão FN; da Gloria Chiarello de Mattos M
    Implant Dent; 2014 Feb; 23(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24384739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL; McMinn WE; Benavides E
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro perception of low-contrast features in digital, film, and digitized dental radiographs: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Grassl U; Schulze RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):694-701. PubMed ID: 17466887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A virtual sinogram method to reduce dental metallic implant artefacts in computed tomography-based attenuation correction for PET.
    Abdoli M; Ay MR; Ahmadian A; Zaidi H
    Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19829166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors.
    Gonçalves A; Wiezel VG; Gonçalves M; Hebling J; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):484-8. PubMed ID: 19767521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Film holder for intraoral dental roentgenography].
    Shamsiev KhN; Makhsudov SN
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1988; 67(6):68-9. PubMed ID: 3238726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of a simple intraoral instrument to standardize film alignment and improve image reproducibility.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ; Zhang JC; Xia B; Dong YF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jul; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 15953923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image homogeneity and recording reproducibility with 2 techniques for serial intra-oral radiography.
    Sander L; Wenzel A; Hintze H; Karring T
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1288-91. PubMed ID: 8997675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method for standardization of intraoral radiographs.
    Kiliç AR; Efeoglu E; Yilmaz S
    Periodontal Clin Investig; 1996; 18(2):20-6. PubMed ID: 9116467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A radiographic analysis of implant component misfit.
    Sharkey S; Kelly A; Houston F; O'Sullivan M; Quinn F; O'Connell B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):807-15. PubMed ID: 21841991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality of digital and film radiographs in applications sent to the Dental Insurance Office in Sweden for treatment approval.
    Hellén-Halme K; Johansson PM; Håkansson J; Petersson A
    Swed Dent J; 2004; 28(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 15272512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validating an uncoupled laser-aiming device for serial implant radiography.
    Thistle GS; Russell KA; Chaytor DV; Russell LT
    J Oral Implantol; 1997; 23(1-2):12-20. PubMed ID: 9477857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
    Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dosage of a dental imaging system.
    Soh G; Loh FC; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 8511278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoral radiographs texture analysis for dental implant planning.
    Mundim MB; Dias DR; Costa RM; Leles CR; Azevedo-Marques PM; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Nov; 136():89-96. PubMed ID: 27686706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.