These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21488970)

  • 1. Effect of plastic-covered ultrasonic scalers on titanium implant surfaces.
    Mann M; Parmar D; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 21488970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19329455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the effects of metallic, nonmetallic, and sonic instrumentation on titanium abutment surfaces.
    Hallmon WW; Waldrop TC; Meffert RM; Wade BW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 8820128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces.
    Augthun M; Tinschert J; Huber A
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 9736367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of titanium dental implants with three piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers: an in vivo study.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Yagi H; Matsumoto K; Ito K
    J Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 78(9):1689-94. PubMed ID: 17760537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH; Shon WJ; Bae KS; Kum KY; Lee WC; Park YS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional analyses of ultrasonic scaler oscillations.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 36(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19017036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy.
    Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant surface alterations from a nonmetallic ultrasonic tip.
    Bailey GM; Gardner JS; Day MH; Kovanda BJ
    J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr; 1998; 46(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 10597152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probing and scaling instrumentation on implant abutment surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Fakhravar B; Khocht A; Jefferies SR; Suzuki JB
    Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 22814556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Buns CE; Mengel C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 9509785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
    Espedito Di Lauro A; Morgese F; Squillace A; Ramaglia L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16367854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on titanium discs: a microscopy and trace elemental analysis in vitro study.
    Tawse-Smith A; Atieh MA; Tompkins G; Duncan WJ; Reid MR; Stirling CH
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2016 Aug; 14(3):191-201. PubMed ID: 26094557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profilometric and standard error of the mean analysis of rough implant surfaces treated with different instrumentations.
    Ramaglia L; di Lauro AE; Morgese F; Squillace A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Mar; 15(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16569965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of subgingival implant surfaces with Teflon-coated sonic and ultrasonic scaler tips and various implant curettes. An in vitro study.
    Rühling A; Kocher T; Kreusch J; Plagmann HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Mar; 5(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 8038341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The treatment of uncoated and titanium nitride-coated abutments with different instruments.
    Mengel R; Meer C; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 15101595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC; Moriarty JD; Kusy RP
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro analysis of the efficacy of ultrasonic scalers and a toothbrush for removing bacteria from resorbable blast material titanium disks.
    Park JB; Jang YJ; Koh M; Choi BK; Kim KK; Ko Y
    J Periodontol; 2013 Aug; 84(8):1191-8. PubMed ID: 23075432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.