525 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21490978)
1. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects.
Kilic N; Catal G; Kiki A; Oktay H
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 20053719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
Altug Z; Arslan AD
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
Alhaija ES
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.
Halicioglu K; Yavuz I; Ceylan I; Erdem A
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion.
Pavoni C; Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Polimeni A; Cozza P
Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19506743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Response of maxillary retrusion cases to face mask treatment.
Ramadan AA
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e29-34. PubMed ID: 19641766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
