These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21490978)

  • 1. Soft and hard tissue profile changes after rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy.
    Kurt G; Uysal T; Yagci A
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e10-8. PubMed ID: 21490978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.
    Sar C; Sahinoğlu Z; Özçirpici AA; Uçkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 24373654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Kiki A; Oktay H
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 20053719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
    Altug Z; Arslan AD
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage.
    Sar C; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Uçkan S; Yazıcı AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of face mask therapy with and without rapid maxillary expansion in adolescent patients.
    Yavuz I; Halicioğlu K; Ceylan I; Dağsuyu IM; Erdem A
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 22866596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Profile changes associated with different orthopedic treatment approaches in Class III malocclusions.
    Arman A; Toygar TU; Abuhijleh E
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):733-40. PubMed ID: 15673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents.
    Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy.
    Macdonald KE; Kapust AJ; Turley PK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10393575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes in postural class III malocclusion treated with a maxillary removable appliance.
    Alhaija ES
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):149-52. PubMed ID: 17315814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
    Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients. Hyrax versus transverse sagittal maxillary expander: a cephalometric investigation.
    Farronato G; Maspero C; Esposito L; Briguglio E; Farronato D; Giannini L
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 21059876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
    Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.
    Halicioglu K; Yavuz I; Ceylan I; Erdem A
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):853-61. PubMed ID: 24628408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion.
    Pavoni C; Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Polimeni A; Cozza P
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 19506743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response of maxillary retrusion cases to face mask treatment.
    Ramadan AA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e29-34. PubMed ID: 19641766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.