These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21490989)
1. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on the acceleration of tooth movement. Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh M World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e52-6. PubMed ID: 21490989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing treatment time: A clinical investigation. Bhad Patil WA; Karemore AA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 May; 161(5):652-658. PubMed ID: 35039203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study. Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Hybrid Orthodontic Treatment System (HOTS). Ikegami T; Wong RW; Hägg U; Lee W; Hibino K World J Orthod; 2010; 11(2):168-79. PubMed ID: 20552104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics and piezocision in rapid canine retraction. Abbas NH; Sabet NE; Hassan IT Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Apr; 149(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 27021451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does alveolar corticotomy accelerate orthodontic tooth movement when retracting upper canines? A split-mouth design randomized controlled trial. Al-Naoum F; Hajeer MY; Al-Jundi A J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 72(10):1880-9. PubMed ID: 25128922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study. da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional analysis of the tooth movement and arch dimension changes in Class I malocclusions treated with first premolar extractions: a guideline for virtual treatment planning. Cho MY; Choi JH; Lee SP; Baek SH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 21130334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osteocalcin and N-telopeptides of type I collagen marker levels in gingival crevicular fluid during different stages of orthodontic tooth movement. Alfaqeeh SA; Anil S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e553-9. PubMed ID: 21640867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anchorage loss during canine retraction using intermittent versus continuous force distractions; a split mouth randomized clinical trial. Mowafy MI; Zaher AR Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 23021114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Periodontal Changes Adjacent to Extraction Sites during Upper Canine Retraction. Al-Jundi A; Sabbagh BA; Baskaradoss JK J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Feb; 18(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 28174364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach. Giancotti A; Greco M Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Holographic analysis of the initial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs. Kumar YM; Ravindran NS; Balasubramaniam MR Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):368-72. PubMed ID: 19216610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anchorage control in bioprogressive vs straight-wire treatment. Urias D; Mustafa FI Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 16448242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of low-level laser therapy on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Limpanichkul W; Godfrey K; Srisuk N; Rattanayatikul C Orthod Craniofac Res; 2006 Feb; 9(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16420273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Controlling mechanical undesirable side effects with a tooth indicated for extraction: free anchorage. Monini Ada C; Gandini LG; Gandini MR; Leite GM; Vianna AP Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e210-20. PubMed ID: 23646332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distal movement of maxillary canines and premolars with sectional mechanics following Distal Jet application to molars. Bolla E; Doldo T; Giorgetti R Prog Orthod; 2004; 5():72-89. PubMed ID: 15329748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rate of tooth movement under heavy and light continuous orthodontic forces. Yee JA; Türk T; Elekdağ-Türk S; Cheng LL; Darendeliler MA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):150.e1-9; discussion 150-1. PubMed ID: 19651334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]